Cream

News

Follow Us

Archive for February, 2010

  • Feb
  • 23

Will 2010 be the Year of Mobile?

Google's Nexus One

Google's Nexus One

Just like 2009 was the year of social media, 2010 is predicted to be the year of mobile. However, this is not the first year in which mobile marketing has been predicted to go mainstream – so why has the prophecy taken so long to come to fruition and why is 2010 predicted to be the year?

The problems with mobile marketing to date can be summed up in 2 words – fragmentation and format. 

The core fragmentation comes with the network operators for whom competition rather than cooperation has been the norm to date.  Then there’s the fragmentation in handsets – different screen sizes, different screen resolutions and differing key pad functionality doesn’t make life easy for advertisers or developers. And the fragmentation of operating systems makes things even more complicated – whether it be Google’s Android, iPhone’s OS or Symbian. And finally, there’s the fragmentation in measurement systems, with stats drawn from different operators and ad networks offering snapshots of different portions of the market rather than a complete overview.

Format has been another struggle for marketers.  SMS and MMS are both highly personal and interactive forms of communication but their strengths have been their weaknesses too.  Without an understanding of the context that potential prospects are in, using this form of marketing can be overly intrusive and have a detrimental rather than positive effect on the brand. 

The other ‘format’ problem has been phone screen size with respect to browsing the mobile web – the latter has never really taken off to date due to small screen sizes making the mobile browsing experience a less than satisfactory one.
So why are things set to change in 2010? Well, not only are some of those problems being addressed but also new developments are on the way that means that the true potential of mobile as a marketing medium are starting to be realised.

For example, network operators are showing more signs of collaboration to deal with the fragmentation problem, including the aim to create an open platform for apps to be developed easily and distributed seamlessly, irrespective of network, OS or handset. And measurement has become standardised with the launch of Mobile Media Metrics earlier this month, a collaboration between the GSMA and ComScore.

And marketers are increasingly getting to grips with the opportunities that SMS and MMS offer -  using mainstream media to deliver the message but using short codes to call/text to make campaigns more involving and to increase response.

Apple's iPod Touch

Apple's iPod Touch

And of course the iPhone has proven to be a ‘game changer’ in terms of browsing the internet from your mobile phone, leading to the introduction of a raft of new smartphones including Google’s own Nexus One. And the availability of these phones on more networks and the introduction of other mobile devices, such as the iPod Touch and the new iTab, will only speed the growth of the mobile web.

However, the really exciting developments are in the worlds of applications, location-based services (LBS) and network operator offerings.

The success of apps has been an unexpected side effect of the iPhone revolution. Phones have always had apps on them, to allow you to send and receive SMS and MMS, browse the web and play video for example, but now the huge range of ‘third party’ apps available, particularly for the iPhone, allows users to ‘customise’ their phone to fit their lifestyle. And as most of these apps are available for free, app developers need other income possibilities and advertising and/or sponsorship-funded is a model which is growing and an opportunity, albeit super niche but super targeted, for advertisers.

Location based services are also on the rise using the inbuilt GPS on many smartphones (if enabled) and this development really leverages the power of  marketing on mobile devices – the ability to market to people ‘on the move’ and understand more about their location and therefore their context. For example, Google now offers a location based search so people can search for services in their locality.

And 2 of the networks have announced  ‘permission based’ mobile advertising programmes, O2  with ‘More’ and Orange with ‘Shots’, which are exciting for advertisers as they allow them to use the vast array of customer information that each network operator has at their disposal to target ads effectively to an audience that has opted into the service.

There is no doubt that marketing to niche audiences in these highly targeted, permissive and personal ways  offer exciting opportunities for premium and luxury brands. But these developments are still embryonic -  attitudes amongst consumers to app advertising or sponsorship are uncertain, Google’s location based service is only available on iPhone OS and Android, and the mobile operator schemes are still in their early stages of recruitment.

As a result, 2010 won’t be the year of the mobile marketing explosion.  But it will be the year of the mobile phone marketing ‘dabble’ – and if your audience is young and at the early end of the adoption cycle it’s certainly worth at least that. But don’t divert too much resource in terms of time or money into this channel just yet – your ‘dabble’ will prepare you for what’s to come but more mainstream channels are more likely to deliver the results that your MD will be craving.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Feb
  • 23

SeeSaw Launch Heralds the Start of Web TV Battle

Web TV Service SeeSaw Launches

Web TV Service SeeSaw Launches

SeeSaw, the new Arqiva-owned online TV service that rose from the ashes of Project Kangaroo, launched last Wednesday.

The new service aims to offer ‘Best of British’ content free to users as well as international programming which will form part of a paid for service to be launched later this year.

At present, SeeSaw can offer 3000 hours of content, a mix of ‘catch up’ and archived programming, from deals they’ve signed with the BBC, Channel 4 and Channel 5.  A further 2000 hours, largely sourced from the US, will be added when the ‘paid for’ service launches in a few months time.

Advertisers will be able to purchase ‘unstoppable’ 60 second ad breaks either before or during the streamed programmes as well as being offered other commercial opportunities such as programme sponsorship. However, the waters are muddied somewhat by the fact that Channels 4 & 5 retain the right to sell advertising within their own programming, so SeeSaw will not be selling all the available inventory on the site.

SeeSaw is launching into a small but already crowded marketplace.  All the major broadcasters already offer their own catch up services – the BBC reported over 100m downloads requests on its iPlayer in December alone – and higher profile sites such as YouTube and MSN Video Player are already in this arena.  To complicate things further, the US based web TV service Hulu is reported to be entering the UK market some time later this year and hoping to line up an exclusive content deal with ITV.

Content will be king in this battle for viewers – much of what is available on SeeSaw is also available on its competitors –  so securing exclusive content programming probably direct from the production houses, is going to be key.   The winner will be the operator who manages to offer the most desirable content in the simplest way, and gets the pricing and the pricing model right – either subscription or transactional.

From a advertiser standpoint, those supporting the service are the larger FMCG and retail brands such as Cadbury, Guinness and Sainsbury’s but services such as SeeSaw could prove an attractive route to market for premium and luxury brands in the future. Web TV services are predicted to be more popular amongst premium consumers who’s TV viewing is lighter and for whom ‘cherry-picking’ their viewing is both more attractive and more achievable than heavier TV consumers. It also allows advertisers to tap into the more upmarket profile of BBC viewers for the first time. And SeeSaw arguably offers a more ‘premium’ environment for luxury advertisers than rivals such as YouTube.

For the time-being, we’d advise you to ‘wait and see’. By the end of this year we’ll understand more clearly how big this market is set to become and who’s likely to win the audience share battle.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Feb
  • 10

News International Promotes the Power of Print

Not only are newspapers still investing in their print offerings to boost advertising revenues, they’re also investing in their own campaigns to prove the effectiveness of print as an advertising medium.

Drawing on research from Microsoft advertising, conducted in association with Brand Science, News International has launched a campaign that will run outdoor and across all its titles that claims that print is the most effective media in terms of generating sales.

The ad campaign, which broke on Sunday, states that every £1 invested in newspaper and magazine generates £6.41 in sales – a return on investment 164% higher than that delivered by TV.

In a world where marketers are increasingly seduced by new media channels, either due to a desire not to be left behind or driven by a need to deliver demonstrable return on investment, News International clearly sees the need to fight back with some hard facts. However, it is difficult to see this campaign having more than a marginal impact as most surveys indicate that marketers plan to further increase their spend on digital, including new investments in the embryonic area of mobile. Further research and sustained publicity will be required for a change in this trend.

Just because a media is more measurable doesn’t necessarily mean that it is more effective.  Traditional print media offers premium and luxury advertisers the opportunity to build awareness and desire amongst a wide swathe of their target audience in a high impact and tangible manner. There is no doubt that effective investment in print makes other digital channels work more effectively - a higher volume of branded search traffic for example or more Facebook fans following the higher profile a print media campaign can bring.

While new digital techniques bring the opportunity to engage with audiences in new and more interactive ways, marketers need to understand what these new channels are bringing to the party in terms of effort vs. reward and not be swept away by the desire to invest heavily in something just because it’s new.   But they also need to understand better the inter-relationship between offline and online and apply a healthy dose of logic and commonsense to their media investments rather than letting themselves be ruled by their RoI spreadsheets.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Feb
  • 9

Mail and Observer Still Investing in Print

Observer Re-Launching 21st February

Observer Re-Launching 21st February

It may seem that many publishers are focusing purely on digital issues – the pros and cons of paywalls for example, or the revenue- generating potential of new versions for smartphones or ereaders – but the week has seen the announcement of significant investment  in good old-fashioned print editions from the Daily Mail and The Observer.

The Daily Mail launched an £10m advertising campaign on 31st January. Moving away from a promotional policy based on CD and DVD giveaways, the campaign focused on the editorial content – specifically on the weekday supplements – as each day’s creative focused on the supplement in the following day’s edition.  The Daily Mail’s Saturday Weekend Supplement has been revamped also, incorporating extra fashion, food and celebrity news to echo the content and look of a paid-for women’s weekly title.

In addition, Guardian News & Media has announced it is re-launching The Observer on 21st February. The loss-making paper appeared close to closure last year, or at the very least a radical change in format. Instead, a re-design has been undertaken that sees the new look paper split into 4 sections – news, sport, review and the magazine – with a focus on bringing the existing celebrity columnists, such as David Mitchell and Mariella Frostrup, more to the fore.  The re-launch will be backed by a marketing drive, created by Wieden & Kennedy and including a TV campaign, aimed at boosting the newspaper’s circulation.

The moves demonstrate how important print still is to publishers.  The move to paywalls is seen by many as motivated by a desire to arrest any further decline in print circulations rather than a credible revenue driver, at least in the short term.  In addition, publishers aren’t yet pinning their hopes on the new generation of ereaders as it’s too early to predict their takeup and any investment in optimising publications for these devices would be significant.

In fact, many industry insiders are predicting a resurgence in print in 2010 and beyond as the recession eases and readers and advertisers alike loosen the purse strings. And perhaps marketing directors are beginning to shake off some of the ROI-only shackles that their boards have been inflicting on them during the recession and the coinciding increase in digital opportunities that allowed such ROI measurement. All that remains to be seen but it is certainly true that for the time being an investment in the improvement of their print offerings is likely to deliver publishers the highest return on their investment.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter