Cream

News

Follow Us

Archive for April, 2010

  • Apr
  • 29

Facebook’s Open Social Graph and What It Means for Luxury Brands

Facebook's Like Button on Levis.com

Facebook's Like Button on Levis.com

Facebook ‘Open Social Graph’ project ‘to put people at the centre of the web’ took a big leap forward with a series of announcements made at last week’s f8 developer conference.

The most significant of these was the launch of the new web-wide ‘Like’ button, replacing their ‘Facebook Connect’ functionality.  Web site owners will be able to easily add ‘Like’ buttons to their web pages, allowing any user who is logged in to Facebook to express a preference for that brand, page or product.

That preference will be shared with the user’s connections on Facebook, where their friends will be able to comment on it, but will also create a link from the user’s profile back to the page – creating a stream of ‘recommendation’ traffic to the brand owner’s or publisher’s website. In addition, by combining that preference with semantic data entered by the site owner, using Facebook’s ‘open graph protocol’, a ‘permanent’ (until deleted by the user) link can be created on that user’s info page. For example, if a band was ‘liked’ then a link to that band’s site would be added to the music section of the user’s info page.

The tools launched by Facebook also allow site owners to personalise the experience on their sites to individual users based on their friends and other Facebook user’s preferences. For example, the  ‘Activity Feed’ plugin will be enable site owners to show users what their friends are sharing, commenting on or recommending from their site, whilst the ‘Recommendations’ option expands this concept to show interactions with the site by all Facebook users, or as Facebook themselves put it ‘a people powered most popular list’.

But the most powerful function is one that allows site owners to combine semantic data with ‘Like’ data to personalise a user’s web experience when they visit their site. For example, know that a user ‘likes’ a celebrity, then as long as they’re logged into Facebook you can deliver them recommendations for clothes and accessories to re-create their look when the user visits your site by tagging your pages appropriately.

Facebook’s leaders hope this will make the web a more social place – where you friends are ever present, guiding you to the most relevant news, the best places and the best products and even going ‘shopping’ with you, albeit virtually. Will it take off? There is little doubt – Facebook is fast approaching 500m users and its pace of growth is accelerating rather than declining. In addition, 25 billion shares between friends already occur monthly on the site and Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s Founder and CEO, confidently predicted 1 billion ‘Likes’ within 24 hours of the service being launched.

There is no doubt that for premium and luxury brands, these could be powerful tools.  Levi’s have already announced a ‘Friends Store’ in which customers who are logged into Facebook can see a list of all of their friends favourite Levi products and shop with their friends online.

But these tools are going to be more useful to brands with more accessible price points and a larger following.  Firstly, a larger following is going to be necessary for the Facebook tools to deliver any meaningful data – the more accessible the brand the more likely browsers are to have friends that ‘like’ that brand too. And the more friends they have interacting with a brand and its products, the more likely they are to come across one whose opinions they trust in that product category.  Secondly, the more affluent consumers become, the less likely they are to trust the opinions of their friends and much more likely to trust their own research and judgement.

But perhaps the most significant development comes from what Facebook isn’t telling us – at least, not yet.  Facebook already understands our demography, our interests, our favourite brands, our friends and what we choose to share with those friends.  This new functionality also helps it to build a more complete profile of our web preferences. This is powerful information for all advertisers and could make Facebook an important, if not the most important, advertising channel for premium and luxury brands.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Apr
  • 27

Could The Independent Stage a ‘Clegg-Like’ Rise to Prominence?

The New Look Independent

The New Look Independent

For the past month, The Independent has been in a position that it seldom occupies – the limelight. 

The lowest circulation quality daily had been as low profile as the Liberal Democrats prior to the first election debate but a string of high profile events has changed all that.

First, there was the purchase of the paper by Alexander Ledbedev from Independent News & Media for £1, then the departure of editor Roger Alton to be replaced by former editor Simon Kelner.  Then the paper launched a re-design spearheaded by Freuds PR followed by a high profile ad and sampling campaign designed by Trevor Beattie of Beattie McGuiness Bungay.

But the real questions is will all this activity inspire a Clegg-like rise up the circulation rankings? And can any short term boost be sustained in the long term?

The re-design, pleasing on the eye though it is, and including the addition of a news review and comment section entitled the ‘Viewspaper’ is not going to save the paper all by itself, although the American Express ad in the launch edition does demonstrate that the paper is prepared to be flexible to please advertisers.

The campaign supporting the relaunch is altogether more interesting – leveraging the election to boost the paper’s profile. The campaign, which runs on TV, outdoor and in print and digital ads, features creatives with the copy such as ‘Rupert Murdoch won’t decide this election. You will’ and ‘Trade Union money won’t decide this election. You will’. 

The campaign is supplemented by branded ‘Battle Buses’ touring the country and staging debates with local candidates and by the distribution of 300,000 free copies of a special ‘election’ edition of the paper in key marginals and constituencies with new independent candidates every day for 10 days in the run up to the election.

By  highlighting the alleged ‘stringpullers’ behind the major political parties, The Independent highlights and makes a merit of its own non-affiliated and non-owner influenced positioning. This could help it tap into the ‘anti-political’ sentiment commonplace since the MP’s expenses row broke and gain it new readers.

However, though it could conceivably close the gap on rivals such as the Guardian and The Times in terms of circulation, it surely would require a herculean investment to turn it into a major player in the qualities market either offline or online longer term.

It’s likely that something more radical will be required and many have speculated that the new owners will follow the own example at the Evening Standard and offer it for free to take on The Metro. However, this strategy is more high risk for the Independent as circulation revenues account for a higher proportion of overall revenue than they did at the Standard.

Still, it’s interesting that the Independent is undergoing such a large free sampling as part of its new campaign – no doubt interested to see what impact 3m extra copies over 10 days has on advertising revenues. Free or partially free circulation may not have been ruled in, but I doubt that it’s been ruled out either.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Apr
  • 21

Promoted Tweets – Something Worth Talking About?

Starbucks Trials Promoted Tweets

Starbucks Trials Promoted Tweets

After much speculation, Twitter have finally announced their plan to monetise their platform.

Promoted tweets were launched last week and much like paid for search ads they will appear at the top of search results and be differentiated from an ‘organic’ tweet by a small piece of highlighted ‘Promoted by..’ text.

Initially, promoted tweets will be charged on a cost per thousand model but this will soon be replaced with a return on investment model.  To challenge advertisers to keep ads relevant and to ensure they achieve a return on investment by matching costs to success, Twitter  will track something they’ve dubbed as ‘resonance’. Resonance will measure user interaction with a promoted tweet, including replies, re-tweets and clicks. Those ads that don’t resonate will soon disappear but brands and companies will not pay for ads that fail to catch on.

At present, only a test is being run with a small selection of advertisers including Starbucks, Red Bull, Sony Pictures and Virgin America so that both twitter and the advertisers can understand how the twitter community reacts to and interacts with this innovation. The aim longer term is to extend the service to twitter clients such as Hootsuite, TweetDeck and Seesmic as well as serving ‘promoted tweets’ within users’ timelines, using their interests, connections, and tweets to serve relevant ads.

So what’s in it for advertisers?  Well 100m+ users and 600m searches per day for starters, offering a mass audience attractive to advertisers.  In addition, the use of promoted tweets will allow them to achieve standout but also to focus attention on a particular message or messages that they want to promote – a message that might otherwise get lost several pages down a user’s timeline without frequent (and irritating) repetition.

For users, the search based offering delivers many of the strengths of Google Adwords – relevant, timely results based on a users requirements. However, when the service moves to serving promoted tweets within a user’s timeline timing become in particular becomes more complex.  By looking at who a user is following, what they search for and what they themselves tweet, if will be possible to understand their interests and serve them relevant ads – but when are those ads timely?  When they tweet on that topic?  Perhaps when users become used to the service they’ll start tweeting for the sort of offers they want and find relevant promoted tweets popping up at the top of their timelines.

As for premium and luxury advertisers, it’s difficult to scope the opportunity from a commercial perspective as there are too many unknowns.  Demographics are important to luxury advertisers as it’s not just about the what (are they interested in) but the how (are they going to pay for it) and information on twitter is sketchy in this regard. What stats exist suggest a bias towards, females, the under 35s and higher income earners, which suggests an opportunity for premium fashion and health and beauty brands in particular. If personalisation can be combined with a degree of automation, Twitter could become an extremely effective channel for brands in these sectors to deliver timely, relevant and highly targeted offers.

The other information ‘black holes’ are who is searching for what, interested in what or tweeting about what in what volumes. Logic would point to the launch of tools similar to Google’s Keyword Research tool when the concept is rolled out and until then, and twitter’s initial first test phase of promoted tweeting has been completed, even Twitter’s own founders are as much in the dark as the rest of us as to the potential of promoted tweets to meet advertisers (and their investors) needs.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Apr
  • 9

Women’s Magazines Weather the Storm

Stylist Magazine Storms into the Top 5

Stylist Magazine Storms into the Top 5

The recession continues to have an impact on consumers making them narrow down their magazine reading repertoire and thus continuing to impact on the circulations of titles in this sector.  However, women’s lifestyle and fashion magazines performed particularly well rising 4.7% in the six month period to the end of 2009 year on year, while women’s weeklies rose 2.9% over the same period.

Shortlist Media, intrepid despite the gloom of recession, launched the free women’s weekly title, Stylist , in October. Stylist has stormed in as the fifth highest circulating women’s lifestyle title, beating its own forecast circulation of 400,000 with a first ABC of 410,674. This was an  impressive result, particularly given that the title was not given much marketing support for its launch.

Whilst the last 6 months of 2009 continued to be a challenge for most businesses the women’s magazine market seemed to show a little more stability. Glamour held its position as leader in the women’s monthly market despite a 5.9% year on year drop and slight dip for the 6 months y on y of 2.1%. Most other titles at least decreased their losses or even increased on the last 6 month period. Among the stronger performers were Woman and Home and Good Housekeeping, interestingly both targeted at the older end of the market and perhaps reflecting the strength and potential of this demographic group.

Both Marie Claire and She showed dramatic year on year drops but their respective change of format and relaunch seem to have staunched their losses, resulting in only 0.8% decrease period on period for Marie Claire and 0.8% increase for She. Both titles will continue to promote heavily with regular cover mounting for She planned for 2010 and continued sampling offered by Marie Claire.

Despite the difficult market, it is clear that women are still not prepared to sacrifice their relationship with their magazine of choice – maybe the choice is narrowed down to one title – but the challenge for the publishers will be persuading a younger cash poor generation to afford magazines in an increasingly free content world.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Apr
  • 9

TV Revenues Start to Rally

As always in a recession, television has suffered shocking revenue falls, around 11.5% between 2008 and 2009. However, in the final quarter of 2009, ITV started to rally showing an impressive 14.9% yr on yr revenue growth in December and the signs are that 2010 will continue the recovery assisted by the World Cup, more X-Factor, Britain’s Got Talent, I’m a Celebrity and the last ever UK Big Brother. Broadcasters are predicting a positive start to the year with anticipated revenue growth of 5% in the first quarter. To counter that, however, there will be a stop on COI advertising in the run-up to the election. Since the government is the largest advertiser in the UK, this could hurt Q2.

February saw the launch of See-Saw, an advertising funded online video-on-demand service, offering free content to users as well as international programming which will form part of a paid for service to be launched later this year. See-Saw launches into an crowded market, with all the major broadcasters already offering their own catch up services and the joint online TV venture, Canvas (BBC, BT, ITV, C4, 5 and Talk Talk) awaiting BBC Trust approval. Ultimately, the key to winning the battle for viewers will be securing exclusive content at the right price and with easy access.

Despite the poor economy, or perhaps reflecting it, TV remains the nation’s favourite leisure activity. As such, TV remains a highly powerful advertising tool, capable of delivering the largest simultaneous group of audiences of any advertising medium. So whilst the buzz continues to grow round the newer methods of delivering television such as iptv and the growing penetration of internet enabled sets in homes (20% of new TVs sold in the UK this year), the lassitude of the viewing public will ensure that, for the time being, traditional TV will continue to deliver the mass numbers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter