Cream

News

Follow Us

Archive for May, 2010

  • May
  • 26

Times and Sunday Times Preview Websites Before Paywall Descends

The Sunday Times Preview Site

The Sunday Times Preview Site

The new look sites for the Times and the Sunday Times have been launched, having been made available for a 4 week preview for users who register before the paywall descends in June.

So how do these sites measure up against the existing online news offerings?

The first things that strikes you about the Times site in particular is the fact that it bears a much stronger visual relationship to its offline cousin than the existing Times Online. The colour palette above the fold is extremely sober giving the site an authoritative and serious look. The Sunday Times, in contrast, is much more image-led reflecting the lighter nature of its content.

Both sites offer simple navigation with a pared down primary navigation bar.  Ajax is used cleverly to allow readers to drill down into other sections of the site, select the top features or toggle between article options. Columnists are particularly to the fore as would be expected, as they are the basis for most of the newspapers’ truly unique content.

However, its clear that News International’s main strategy for differentiation can be summed up in one word – interactivity. Rich media such as video content is used to bring news stories and columns to life, broadcast celebrity ‘tips’ and stream live interviews. And journalists emerge from the shadows to help readers attain a greater depth of understanding – hosting forums and live debates on the most topical stories.

So is it enough for users to want to pay £1 per day or £2 per week to access the content?  Well, that depends on how truly loyal the Times’ online readers prove to be, how simple the payment process is from the user perspective and how well the editorial team can leverage the power of the News International empire to create truly unique and compelling content.

A recent poll conducted by Entertainment Media Research for Wiggin, a media law firm, suggested that 9% of Times Online readers would be willing to pay for online access. But 9% of what? The Times commands over 20m monthly online users and if 9% of those were prepared to fork out £2 a week, James Harding, The Times Editor, would be a very happy man. However, I’d hazard a guess that the Times team would be happy with a regular subscriber base in the 200,000 to 250,000 range.

The fact is, nobody knows how many people are prepared to pay for the convenience of online news from their favourite source rather than searching it out elsewhere on the web. That’s why even those publications that have nailed their colours to the free access mast will be watching this launch with intense interest.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • May
  • 26

‘Quality not Quantity’ the Mantra for 21st Century Women

Glamour Magazine's 21st Century Woman Report

Glamour Magazine's 21st Century Woman Report

Two recent pieces of research point to the premium sector being the key battleground for fashion and beauty brands over the next 5 years.

The ’21st Century’ Woman report, published recently in Glamour magazine, explores the attitudes of younger women (primarily between 16 and 40.)  Of those surveyed, 81% said they were more likely to buy a few high quality items than many cheap ones – a shift towards quality and away from quantity when compared with the first survey findings in 2006.

Recent Verdict research also suggests a more buoyant period for the top end of the fashion market with a prediction that premium womenswear sales will grow almost 50% faster than the womenwear sector as whole over the next 5 years – driven by inflation, higher costs and an aging population that favours quality over quantity.

But the news is not all good for premium retailers.

Glamour’s survey suggests that consumers are going to be demanding more for their investment – 71% of those surveyed were more careful with their money than 4 years ago, and 75% were going to be shopping around for the best prices.

Verdict’s research suggests that this ‘more demanding consumer’ effect will be compounded by increasing competition as mid market retailers, being squeezed by value retailers and seeing the opportunity at the top end, offer sub brands to capitalise on the faster growth at this end of the market.

Clearly retailers are going to need to continue to invest in product but we’d suggest they also need to invest in their brands to stand out in what is going to become an increasingly cluttered marketplace.

Social media strategies are going to be important, especially among younger women who love to share with their extensive online and offline peer groups.  But magazines are also going to be key – perhaps more so. As the recent ABCs have demonstrated, women’s magazines have weathered the recession much better than many media sectors and Glamour’s research found that for even it’s younger demographic many attach more importance to traditional channels than to digital media.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • May
  • 26

What Impact Will the iPad Have on Publishing?

Apple's iPad Goes on Sale in April

Apple's iPad Goes on Sale in UK on Friday

Apple’s latest creation, the iPad, will launch in the UK on Friday.

The device’s launch has exceeded expectations in the US – the sale of over 1m units in the first month led to the European launch being moved back.

Condé Nast announced they were working on an iPad version even before the device became official, and have already launched iPad apps for GQ, Vanity Fair and Wired magazines.  The FT also recently launched their app, with the Times and Sunday Times reported to be launching theirs this week.

But do publishers really think the iPad will transform their businesses – boosting circulation numbers and opening up new audiences to advertisers?

The answer to that question is ‘probably, but not just yet’.  Recent quotes from such prominent figures as Mail Online MD James Bromley and Condé Nast Digital UK Manager Emanuela Pignataro suggest that although they see the future potential, they expect it to be a few years yet before adoption reaches a critical mass. And that’s if the iPad proves to be the dominant device in the ereader field.

Publishers have 2 problems before they embrace the iPad as the saviour of their businesses. The first is volumes – as Bromley of the Mail says ‘These are really very embryonic devices…we’re talking about a very narrow subsection of society that will have these in 2010…2011, 2012, 2013 will be when these will become slightly more mainstream.’

The second problem is the investment required to optimise the platform.  Most newspaper content platforms can only just cope with print and web publishing and aren’t suited for the rapidly developing multichannel world that the plethora of new devices has thrust them into.  And related to this is the investment required to optimise their publications for the intuitive touch screen functionality of the device – as Simon Waldman of the Guardian Media Group puts it, publishers will have to go ‘above and beyond’ their existing website strategy to create the optimum iPad experience.  Whilst it remains niche, publishers will be unwilling to make significant investments in this regard.

These sober attitudes seem wise given the recent news that GQ had sold only 365 downloads of its Men of the Year iPad edition in December.  So the rush of activity we’re seeing doesn’t represent a heady optimism about the new device on behalf of publishers – more a desire to experiment with format, functionality and pricing on a device that could have a transformative impact on their business in a few years time. The first iPad ready publications we’re likely to see won’t be groundbreaking, probably very similar to the existing web or iPhone versions, because significant investment won’t be committed from cash-strapped publishers until the device has proved it’s no passing fad.

But if the publishers do see accelerating take up and start to invest significant sums, that will be the cue for premium and luxury advertisers to appraise the opportunity it represents and possibly jump on board.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • May
  • 7

Free Access vs Paywalls – Newspapers Take Up Their Positions

Times Online to Disappear Behind a Paywall in June

Times Online to Disappear Behind a Paywall in June

The position of all of the UK’s major newspapers on the ‘news paywall’ issue is starting to become clear, with the Mail Online joining the Guardian/Observer on the ‘free’ news side of the fence as opposed to News International’s Times/Sunday Times which are to disappear behind paywalls in June.

The Mail Online’s Publisher Martin Clarke, nailed his colours to the mast last month dismissing the prospect of a paywall and declaring the Mail Online ‘big enough to make the advertising model pay’. This announcement comes after a year of strong growth for the newspaper site – it now has 65% more daily users than last year according to the latest ABCes – as it attempts to position itself as a major international rather than purely UK player.

The Guardian, which itself has enjoyed 40% year on year daily user growth, had already positioned itself firmly in the ‘free’ camp. Alan Rusbridger, The Guardian’s Editor, has strongly stated his belief that newspapers would be foolish to turn their backs on the world of free sharing of content and has recently locked horns with Rupert Murdoch on the subject

Neither of these papers has ruled out paid content, but both believe that readers will only be prepared to pay for ‘specialist’ content and versions of their publications optimised for mobile devices such as the iPhone and iPad.

However, News International’s plans to charge for access to all content from the Times and Sunday Times continue apace. This month will see the launch of a new site for the former, and a standalone site for the latter with the promise of additional features such as daily live Q&As with the journalists.  The charges have also been announced with daily access costing £1 and weekly access to both websites £2.

Recent studies have suggested that around 7% of online readers are prepared to pay for online content. If the Times can convince that proportion of its monthly online readers to pay for 17 daily subscriptions or 8 weekly subscriptions, then its online revenues will rival those of the Guardian, and that’s before advertising is taken into account. It doesn’t look impossible to achieve.

Moreover, if The Times and Sunday Times can leverage their relationships with these loyal readers to find out more about them, their demographics, preferences, interests and behaviours, both sites could remain an attractive proposition for advertisers, particularly premium and luxury advertisers who want to target their audiences more specifically and avoid waste.

However, the key to the success of the great paywall project will hinge on 3 factors – the ability of the Times/Sunday Times to provide superior quality content to both attract subscribers and stop them drifting away; the reaction of the other publications to the project if it’s successful (what might the Telegraph, the no.3 online publication, do if the paywall is a success?) -  and the impact of the decreased online exposure of the brands on their offline circulations.

On the latter point, Martin Clarke said recently ‘Our website does not threaten our paper, it protects it’. Will paywalls have the desired effect of protecting print circulations or could the removal of Times content from the mass of internet users actually have the reverse effect – out of sight meaning out of mind and less people picking up the odd copy to and from work. It’s a cliché but in these uncharted territories its true – only time will reveal the answers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • May
  • 6

Jimmy Choo Do But Should You Use Foursquare Too?

Foursquare - the social location-based game

Foursquare - the social location-based game

Premium and luxury brand owners had their interest piqued by a new social media phenomenon last week when Jimmy Choo announced it was using Foursquare to promote their new trainer range. 

Foursquare, best described as a location-based social game, combines a social utility element, allowing ‘players’ to share their location with their friends, contacts and other players, and a social gaming element as players battle for points, badges and titles. 

Using the GPS on a player’s phone, Foursquare knows where that ‘player’ is but will only publish that player’s location when he ‘checks into’ a venue – be that a bar, restaurant or shop. At that point his contacts are ‘pinged’ with his location, so they can come and join him if they choose. Also, players can see where their contacts are, depending on where they’ve most recently ‘checked into’ and who else playing the game is in the same venue as them. By looking at that venue’s tips (best food, drinks etc) players can look up suggestions for what to do there, and leave tips of their own for other players. They can also broadcast comments from that venue that can be shared with their contacts on Foursquare, as well as Twitter and Facebook. Players can also find other venues in the same vicinity that they can check into. 

As for the gaming element, players receive points for checking in to places and these ‘check ins’ are also the way to unlock certain status ‘badges’. Neither points nor badges lead to any tangible rewards within the game other than status, with players being able to compare their points and badges with their friends and other players. Frequent visitors to a location are also named ‘mayor’ of that venue – a status that is competitively vied for amongst players. 

Soon after its launch in March 2009, local ‘bricks and mortar’ businesses realised the potential of Foursquare to drive advocacy and footfall and started offering players incentives for check ins and rewards for becoming the mayor of their venue. These tangible rewards for participation, alongside the status rewards offered by the service, have fuelled its growth. A little over a year after its launch, Foursquare is reported to be approaching the 1m user mark and is now available in almost 100 cities worldwide, including London, Manchester, Birmingham and Bristol. 

Larger brands are just starting to experiment with the service. For example, the FT.com is offering free access to premium content for players who checked in at certain venues around business schools, primarily as a sampling exercise to attract the younger, educated and tech savvy crowd that Foursquare attracts. Marc Jacobs allowed any player who checked into one of their ‘Marc by Marc Jacobs’ stores to unlock a badge which gave them entry to a prize draw to win tickets to the Marc Jacob’s show at the recent New York Fashion Week. And of course, Jimmy Choo has just piloted the service in London to promote its new trainers – as the trainers check into various locations around London, players have the chance to rush to that venue to win a pair before the trainers move on. 

Foursquare has unlocked a simple and effective way to understand both a user’s location and their context when they’re in that location – i.e. having a coffee, shopping for clothes etc. This is powerful information for advertisers which becomes ever more valuable as the Foursquare community grows both geographically and in size. As users are ‘checking in’, it is believed that advertising will be seen as beneficial rather than obtrusive. Although no such service has yet been launched, companies such as Yahoo have seen the potential which is why they were prepared to offer $100m to buy the service

So should premium and luxury brands be experimenting with the service? If you’re audience is metropolitan, male biased, under 34 and of the ‘early adopter’ mentality, then perhaps. On a purely commercial level, the service can drive footfall by increasing awareness of ‘bricks and mortar’ locations, bringing friends together to socialise and shop and increasing word of mouth. The platform allows brands to understand who their advocates are, how they behave and what they think – these are great insights for building closer relationships, priming advocates to become more vocal on your behalf and for a little market research. And it’s easy to take part, Foursquare now offers an easy (and free) dashboard to allow businesses to sign up

However, don’t expect a flood of response. The take up in the UK as yet is unknown although Hitwise has indicated user growth is rapid. 

But bear in mind, Foursquare isn’t the only location-based game out there and may lose out in the long term to one of its rivals such as Gowalla or Booyah. However, many of these competitive services are similar to Foursquare – emulating some of its most successful attributes – so any experience of getting Foursquare to work for you isn’t going to be wasted if a competitor proves to be the long term winner in this field. 

Whoever wins, it’s unlikely that location based services are just going to be a flash in the pan as Google, Twitter and Facebook are all enhancing their services with location based data. So understanding how to make location based social media work for you is going to be an excellent learning for the future. Just don’t sink too much time and resource into it initially, however, as the return on investment is unlikely to be there.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess