Cream

News

Follow Us

Archive for January, 2011

  • Jan
  • 27

Have Luxury Brands Learned to Love Digital?

The Digital Agenda Report from the Luxury Society

The Digital Agenda Report from the Luxury Society

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but most luxury executives now admit that their brands were slow to embrace the digital revolution and to seize an opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to leadership and innovation.

But have luxury brands truly embraced digital?  If so, how?  And are there still pockets where luxury brands are lagging behind? The recently released report from the Luxury Society, The Digital Agenda, aims to answer these questions.

The imperative behind the adoption of digital for most of the 500 respondents was improving brand awareness and communicating product information – 92% used digital techniques for the former objective and 90% for the latter.

But luxury brands are also adopting digital, and social media in particular, to connect and engage with new and existing customers. 85% of the sample noted this as a business objective, with 71% having created a Facebook Page and 54% having a Twitter profile. Fewer had realised the customer service benefits of these media though – 69% mentioned using digital to improve their customer service as an objective.

Ecommerce had also been adopted by many – 75% used digital to sell products and services – although for most, online sales only accounted for less than 10% of sales.  The expectation was for this to grow over the next 3 years, with 56% of the respondents expecting ecommerce sales to represent between 10 and 25 % of their business by 2013, and 37% expecting between 25 to 50% of their sales to be generated by this channel. However, the report noted that many brands had not yet extended their ecommerce offerings beyond the US and Europe, and were missing opportunities in key emerging markets such as Russia and China.

In terms of the allocation of digital media spend, at present only 23% of respondents spent more than 25% of their budget on digital. However, by 2013, this figure was expected to double. The luxury executives surveyed clearly preferred known, premium and controllable environments for their online promotional efforts.  Online luxury and lifestyle magazines and exclusive community sites were popular. Advertising networks weren’t, entirely due to the lack of visibility of the environments in which their advertising would be appearing.

So far so good. The majority of luxury brands seem to be up to speed with digital even if they’re not at the forefront of innovation. But there are a few key areas where the report found that digital opportunities were not being grasped.

For example, branded digital content such as online videos and magazines – an excellent way to engage and inform prospects about the brand’s story and the craftsmanship behind its products, and to drive relevant prospects to their sites virally – had only been embraced by 58% of respondents. 

And considering most luxury consumers researched new products via search engines, it was surprising to see only 58% had invested in search engine optimisation.

Digital PR also saw relatively low levels of take up, suggesting that luxury brands were still lagging behind their consumers in their adoption of digital media and were often failing to connect with key influencers such as bloggers.

Finally, just 35% had implemented mobile solutions such as a mobile apps, tablet apps and mobile sites.  This relatively low percentage was offset by the 37% of respondents who were planning moves into this channel soon.

The survey reveals an industry growing increasingly confident with digital media and showing a desire to innovate in a measured and controlled way.  This seems to be an entirely sensible way to proceed from an industry that has more to lose by getting it wrong.  However, there are pockets of obvious opportunity where some brands are missing out, such as the creation of branded content and the implementation of online PR.

Research proves that luxury consumers are sophisticated and more likely to be engaged with digital technology than the rest of the market. Luxury brands need to proceed in a carefully thought through and measured manner but perhaps ‘up the pace’ to ensure they meet the high expectations of their customers rather than risking disappointment.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Jan
  • 26

Can Group Buying Work for Premium & Luxury Brands?

Kelkoo SelectGroup buying, or social shopping, is certainly in the news.  Google’s unsuccessful attempt to buy the market leader, Groupon, a couple of months ago was followed by rumours that Groupon is planning an IPO valuing the company at up to $15bn.  For a company that launched just over 2 years ago, that’s a quite an achievement.

Hence, it’s hardly surprising that Google is reportedly launching its own service – Google Offers – after its advances were spurned.

But is group buying something that premium and luxury brands should be paying attention to? To answer this question, we need to look a little at the roots of social shopping and where it’s going.

Group buying was founded on 3 principles:

- Local offers from local businesses – hence, consumers sign up for the Groupon that relates to their locality, be it London, Brighton, Manchester or Nottingham etc

- Great Offers – retailers offer huge discounts. In some cases, up to 90% off. It may be on distressed stock, or it may be a sampling campaign with the aim of giving consumers a low cost trial in the hope they’ll come back and pay at full price at some point in the future. Or, more commonly now, it may be a discount on gift vouchers (£50 gift voucher for £25 etc).

- Social – the offers are only triggered when those interested reach a pre-determined level. Hence the retailer is guaranteed a minimum volume of business for their discount.

Premium and luxury brands are less likely to have a purely local focus and/or devalue their brands by discounting heavily, so surely group shopping is not for them? Not necessarily.

First of all, we need to consider the audience – younger, female, educated and relatively affluent.  The core market for many fashion, accessories and beauty businesses.

Secondly, because of its local focus, social shopping could be a relatively low cost way to create some tactical local noise and footfall for bricks & mortar retailers during key trading periods – for a new store opening or during quiet periods – by offering discounted gift vouchers for example.

And social shopping doesn’t necessarily need to be local.  Two of the most successful offers – Gap on Groupon and Amazon on LivingSocial – have been for nationwide offers for national brands.  Gap redeemed almost ½ million discount vouchers back in August 2010, driving footfall across their retail network of stores in the US. A retailer could use it for a national campaign.

But can the social shopping phenomena work for luxury brands that don’t have ‘distressed’ or ‘end of line’ stock and for whom discounting is an anathema?

Perhaps, via a new service launched by Kelkoo called Kelkoo Select. What’s different about this service?  Well, discounts aren’t essential, although exclusives are.  Hence, exclusive preview events and added value offers can be substituted for discounts. And the ‘group’ in ‘group buying’ isn’t compulsory – hence offers don’t need to reach a critical mass before they’re triggered unlike Kelkoo’s rivals.

This service has just been launched so it’s still early days as to whether it will be a success. Could exclusives and upgrade offers work when the ‘hook’ for social shopping experiences has been big discounts?  And online phenomena like Google and Facebook have demonstrated that niche players can find it hard to survive the onslaught of a dominant market player once they spot a profitable niche and decide to move into it.

We should, of course, sound a couple of notes of warning, before recommending that brands grasp the social shoping nettle.  The audience may be understood demographically, but it is still opaque from a brand’s perspective – hence a brand won’t know whether they’ll be speaking to a new audience or just offering discounts to an audience of existing loyal clients.

And there is disagreement as to whether these services can work as a sampling exercise, or whether they’re followed by ‘offer junkies’ who won’t respond to anything other than big discounts.

But social shopping is only going to get bigger. Luxury and premium marketers needn’t necessarily participate – it’s not for everyone – but they should at least appraise the opportunity thoroughly to see if it’s right for their brand.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Jan
  • 26

Could Location-Based Marketing Do Your Brand More Harm Than Good?

Texting on BlackberryLocation-based marketing represents an exciting prospect for marketers of bricks & mortar retailers. The high potential wastage of advertising consumed at home or at work is replaced with the ability to target people who are actually in the vicinity of a store and probably in a ‘shopping’ mindset. And the competition and clutter isn’t there yet due to its ‘new-ness’.  It’s no wonder that so many brands are jumping onto the location-based bandwagon, looking to steal a march on their competitors by being first movers in this category.

Just in the past couple of weeks, both Marks & Spencer and House of Fraser have signed up to O2’s ‘More’ pilot mobile marketing programme. This involves SMS and MMS being sent from participating brands to people that have opted into the scheme when they’re in the vicinity of one of that brand’s stores, as identified by the GPS on their phone.

The brands that have signed up also have the reassurance that the consumer has expressed an interest in offers for their category – be that food or fashion.  House of Fraser is using the service to send mobile discount vouchers that promote different departments and differ each weekend, whereas Marks & Spencer are initially using the offer to promote their food offering – in this case, promoting a free smoothie available when a Simply Longer sandwich or salad is purchased.

Opted in prospects receiving offers in a category in which they’ve expressed an interest when they’re in the vicinity of the store in which they can redeem that offer – surely marketing doesn’t get any more targeted than that?  And yet there’s still something scattergun about this approach, and this is where marketers need to tread carefully.

From the consumers’ perspective, there’s the potential for them to tire of the service very easily. Although advertisers know these prospects have signed up for the service and know they’re interested in the category they’re advertising, there’s still going to be a large degree of wastage.  Advertisers still have no understanding of the complexities of brand preference and the context of that particular shopping trip.  It may be that a consumer is shopping for clothes, but just doesn’t happen to have a taste for the clothes from the retailer offering a mobile voucher in that category, or for the type of clothes being offered from that brand. Another text just clogs up the inbox.
Or the consumer is out meeting a friend for a coffee and just happens to be strolling past House of Fraser en route – will the text be welcome, or an irritant, particularly if that rendezvous is a regular one and the text tone becomes a regular part of the journey.

An understanding of brand preference will come with time, of course, as people respond to the offers they’re sent. Context is a trickier hurdle to overcome as it’s difficult to predict the ‘missions’ consumers have embarked upon as they venture out shopping.

There’s also the problem with singling out a group of people for ‘special treatment’ just because they happen to be in the vicinity of a store and signed up to a mobile voucher scheme. How might loyal customers react when others seem to be getting preferential treatment on what seems like an arbitrary basis? Or might loyal customers, happy to pay full price, suddenly be bombarded with discount offers? Some form of filtering versus existing customer databases may help to alleviate some of the problem but retailers won’t hold data on all of their customers.

The alternative, of course, is the check-in schemes offered by the likes of FourSquare and Facebook Places. When customers reach locations, they physically ‘check in’ to that location, usually in expectation of receiving some sort of reward. On FourSquare, this relates to badges and titles, such as the ‘Mayor’ of a location, as well as retailer-generated offers.  For Places, rewards will come in the form of retailer offers, but only when Facebook Deals launches in the UK – it’s currently on trial in the US.

‘Check-In’ services are more consumer generated than ‘push’ voucher services.  The user generates the ‘check-in’, in the case of retailers, primarily because they’re interested in a deal, rather than being pushed a marketing message as with O2’s proximity service. So the marketing is likely to be more targeted because the user is actively seeking the offer.

And FourSquare and Facebook have a wealth of data at their fingertips – interests, brands followed and an understanding of what sort of places the user checks into – which in the future retailers could use to tailor those rewards and offers or to select the recipients for those offers more precisely.

But there are 3 problems.

‘Checking-In’ is a niche pursuit at best – even in the US, the birthplace of location based marketing, a recent study by AdAge has estimated that just 0.02% of MacDonald’s customers check-in.  Hence, only brands with mass appeal are going to be able to generate any sort of scale from these services.

Secondly, most of this niche market is young and male – albeit well educated and affluent.  For fashion retailers in particular, this is hardly the core market.

And finally, there’s still the problem of offering customers special treatment just because they’ve made the effort to check in.  At least, in this case the brand is rewarding something tangible and beneficial – a check in on FourSquare will  register on the feeds of the user’s Facebook friends and Twitter followers, helping to spread online word of mouth.  But the benefit offered by some retailers seems to be disproportionate to the effort involved. Can huge discounts be justified? Many brands have overcome this by offering small donations to charities instead of discounts for check-ins, although this, conversely, means that people are less likely to check-in.

Our advice wouldn’t be to rule out location-based services altogether – there’s plenty of potential, particularly if these services can be integrated with in-house CRMs to get a more holistic view of behaviour and target offers more accurately. But brands need to ensure that they’re embarking on this journey fully aware of the pitfalls as well as the benefits

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Jan
  • 13

Traditional Media: Reports of the Death of Print are Premature

Every yReports_of_the_death_of_print_are_prematureear sees further predictions as to when print media will finally be put out of its misery by its digital cousin. There’s no doubt print media is down, but it’s far from out. In fact, we believe some sectors may stage a bit of a comeback in 2011.

Let’s look at newspapers – the clouds gathering around this sector showed some signs of silver linings in 2010. Take the Evening Standard – a publication on its knees before Alexander Lebedev purchased it and made it free. It’s circulation continues to soar and its advertising revenues continue to climb. It may have diluted its upmarket audience somewhat but it remains a better vehicle for premium brands than rivals such as the Metro.

And who would have believed that 2010 would see the launch of a new national newspaper – i from the Independent. Although its circulation doesn’t pitch it into the big league, it looks like it’s going to double the circulation of its sister title The Independent, delivering a time poor, affluent audience.  And if it becomes free, as we expect it to, we could see another title with soaring circulations. Not something that the digital doomsayers would have predicted.

On the magazine front, the trend to ‘free’ will also grow. The success of Stylist, the sister publication to men’s title Shortlist, has piqued the interest of the big magazine publishers, especially as they see more advertisers flocking to the title. On the whole, magazine circulations and readerships have fared relatively well in the recession, with the exception of the ‘lads mag’ category, but they are declining nonetheless, albeit gradually.  For publishers, the only way to achieve strong growth may be to make existing titles free or launch new ones.

The final category which I think will stage a little renaissance in 2011 is outdoor. Of course, much of the growth in this sector has come from digital, but I think good old fashioned 6 sheets, 48 sheets, bus sides et al may stage a recovery. Why? Because it’s an exceptionally effective interruptive media – people can’t click away, switch off or turn over the page.  Interruptive media may not be fashionable in this era of permission marketing but we all like to be interrupted from time to time – with something useful, entertaining or uplifting.

Killing off something that’s been around for over 500 years is going to take more than a few years, and that’s because in some respects print is superior to its digital cousin.  Whilst digital is individual, interactive, engaging and memorable, print is tactile and tangible, its ad formats can be highly impactful, people spend more time with it and it can cost effectively deliver mass audiences.  The cleverest of publishers has yet to surpass the experience of flicking through a magazine or newspaper online.

Rather than deadly rivals, we like to see print and digital as close friends that can work well together to optimise the effectiveness of campaigns. And we think they’ll be working hand-in-hand in this manner for many years to come.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Jan
  • 13

Should Retailers Get Serious About Mobile?

Should_Retailers_Get_Serious_About_Mobile2010 was a remarkable year for mobile.  

By June, 15m people possessed a smartphone. In 18 months time, it is estimated three quarters of all UK consumers will have one. 

This rapid adoption of internet enabled mobile devices is changing the nature of consumers’ shopping behaviour and, by all accounts, this sale season has been a watershed.  UK retailers have reported increases in mobile browser traffic of up to 100% between 24th and 27th December, and Ebay has just reported a threefold increase in its mobile sales, with UK consumers being the fastest adopters of m-commerce.

So how are people using their smartphones when shopping? 

Well, from a mobile browsing perspective, not much differently to how they’re using their PC at home – the top 2 activities are browsing for products and making purchases. The third, checking store locations, demonstrates the importance of building store locator functionality into mobile sites and apps. 

But the browser isn’t the only functionality that shoppers are using to enhance their experience.  Guy Laurence, Chief Executive of Vodafone, recently described how the company had identified MMS hotspots around store changing rooms, as shoppers photographed themselves in outfits with their mobile phones, sent it to their friends and waited for feedback before buying. 

In some respects, the role of the smartphone in the retail experience brings positive benefits to the retailer. For example, shoppers encountering the problem of out of stock products in store can now search for them online and order them there and then – a process which retailers should do their best to facilitate. 

However, in other respects it can be negative.  Consumers can now browse competing offerings and perhaps even make a puchase from a competitor without even leaving a retailer’s store. The transparency the web has brought has stepped up to a whole new level. 

However, while smartphones are undoubtedly changing consumer behaviour, it’s important to maintain a sense of perspective. Mobile browsing is most popular amongst younger age groups, namely 18-34s, and penetration falls away markedly amongst older age groups,  particularly 55+s.  And at present, men are more likely to browse the web on their mobile than women.  And although branded mobile sites are seeing huge increases in traffic, most mobile browsing doesn’t stray far from the two mainstays of Google and Facebook. 

In addition, mobile purchases tend towards the lower end of the price spectrum. Although M&S have reported consumers purchasing sofas on their mobile site, only 9% of purchases are over £10. 

So what does all this mean for mobile strategy?  Well, firstly, no retailer can afford not to have one.  Even those who rely on an older demographic need to bear in mind that text is a technology with mass adoption amongst all age groups even if mobile browsing hasn’t reached that point yet. 

When formulating a strategy, their are several options that retailers need to consider: 

Mobile Calls to Action 

With consumers being bombarded with so many promotional messages, the best time to turn their interest into action is immediately. As people have their mobiles with them at all times, mobile calls to actions such as QR codes and text short codes are excellent ways to achieve this. 

Mobile Apps 

This is the bandwagon that most brands have jumped on but often for the wrong reasons.  The key to successful apps is utility – some useful function that your app can perform well that is consistent with your brand’s mission and adds value for your customers.  Many brands have rushed out poorly conceived and constructed apps to the detriment of their brands. 

The Mobile Web 

Amazon and Ebay were the retail pioneers of the mobile web – Ebay recently claimed $2bn of sales via their mobile site – but now brands such as M&S and John Lewis have launched mobile sites with encouraging results. In short, a mobile website has become a must for retailers. 

Mobile Advertising 

Although mobile ad spend is predicted to grow from £38m in 2010 to £86m in 2011, according to the IAB, this is still a tiny proportion of overall online ad spend. The advantages of mobile advertising are it’s ‘intimacy’ and its ‘new-ness’ – research shows that advertising is looked upon more favourably and more likely to be interacted with than online advertising in other arenas. And people have a wide range of interaction options built in to the device they’re browsing on – be it visiting a retailers’ mobile site or ‘clicking to call’.

The negatives are perhaps the lack of impact that the small screen dictates and the fact that its most powerful targeting method, geo-targeting, is hampered by a lack of understanding of context i.e. even if you know where a consumer is, you don’t know why they’re there. And inevitably, as its new-ness declines, so will response and engagement rates. 

Check-In Services 

FourSquare and Gowalla were the pioneers of the check-in but Facebook Places has the most potential to make ‘checking in’ to locations a mainstream activity.  Checking-in to a ‘place’ shares that location with the user’s friends, so is great (and free) viral marketing for retailers, which many reward with discounts and free extras. 

However, checking-in is far from a mainstream activity and Facebook Places has yet to take off. And those that are active ‘check-inners’ tend to be young and male – not every retailers’ core demographic.  However, this phenomenum is worth watching closely. If the rewards are there for consumers, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t grow in popularity, something that Facebook is addressing with ‘Deals’

Opt in Mobile Marketing Services 

These have been set up by service providers, notably O2, and provide a pool of customers who are actively interested in receiving offers and have opted into the service.  By combining preference data supplied by their members with behavioural data, the service providers are able to provide precise behavioural segments to brands to market to via the customers’ mobile phones. 

The smartphone revolution is now well underway and there’s no going back for retailers. And smartphones aren’t the only mobile device they need to consider – iPad sales are forecast to to be 5 times higher than 2010 this year, and a swell of other tablet devices will soon be flooding the market. 

Retailers who embrace this revolution in a considered, measured and integrated manner have a chance to steal a march on their competitors.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter