Cream

News

Follow Us

Archive for October, 2011

  • Oct
  • 17

Two (More) Developments from Facebook – the New Insights and a New Ad Format

Lost in all the excitement over timelines and tickers have been 2 small but significant announcements from Facebook in recent weeks.

The first relates to a complete overhaul of Facebook Insights, the tool that page owners use to judge the success of their page.

For starters, three new metrics have joined the familiar count of overall ‘Likes’ at the top of the Insights page.  These are:

Friends of Fans – a count of all the friends on Facebook of your current fans, taking into account any mutual friends that those fans might have.  It’s a good way for brands to understand what the viral reach of their Facebook campaign could be, whether that be an ad campaign like Sponsored Stories or a viral content campaign.

People Talking About This – this is the number of people who have engaged with a page over the past week. In this case, engagement is defined as Facebook users liking the page, RSVP’ing to an event, commenting on or sharing a post, tagging the page in an update or in a photo or posting to the page’s wall.

Weekly Total Reach – this is the number of people who have seen any page content or ads pointing to the page over the past 7 days.

All of this information is useful at a macro level but it’s the next level of detail down that makes the new Facebook Insights really interesting – the performance of individual page posts.

For the most recent 500 posts to their pages, marketers will be able to see:

- The Reach of that post – the number of people that saw it.

- The Engagement level – the number of people that clicked on that post, including those that viewed videos or pictures.

- The volume of people that Talked About the post – the number of Facebook users who actively engaged with the post, including liking, commenting, sharing, tagging or RSVP’ing.

- The ‘Virality’ of the post – a new metric which will soon enter marketers’ lexicons, ‘Virality’ is merely an expression of the number of people who have ‘Talked About’ a post as a percentage of the ‘Reach’ of that post.

 

New_Facebook_Insights

 

These new metrics mean that not only will marketers fully understand what proportion of their fan base is seeing their posts, they’ll also understand how much impact those posts are having, and what sort of impact.

By reviewing and analyzing this data, marketers will be understand better what sort of content their fans like to consume and what sort of content their fans like to interact with and pass on to their friends.

In addition, a new ‘arms race’ will begin amongst rival brands as the ‘People Talking About’ metric will also be viewable by any Facebook user who visits a fan page, published below the number of page ‘Likes’. Rival brands will be vying with each other not only for popularity but for talkability.

At present, the new Insights is available by clicking a link at the top of the existing Insights page.

The second significant development is the introduction of a new ad format – the Premium Ad Unit.  In a similar way to promoted tweets on Twitter, brands can turn a page post – be that a message or a video – into an ad.

premium_ad_unit

Echoing the highly successful ‘Sponsored Stories’ format, if a Facebook user’s friend has ‘liked’ the brand advertising, the ad will expand to incorporate that information in addition to the post information.

At present, the new format is only available via Facebook’s direct sales team but we expect it to be popular with advertisers because it combines the advertiser’s message with a social element. It also a larger format ad format which will display on the right hand side of a user’s homepage with no other ads present – hence attracting more attention from users.

When you consider the major changes announced at the f8 conference alongside these recently announced innovations, there’s certainly much for Facebook marketers to consider in the coming weeks.

But for us, the key learning is that brands shouldn’t just focus on building a following amongst their target audiences, they need to have strategies to engage those users, to get conversations going about their brands, in order to recruit new fans and new customers, be that via engaging posts or social advertising.

And as Facebook wants an increasingly engaged user base to boost ad inventory and to sell premium ad formats, it’s doing all in its power to ensure brands have the tools to play their part.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Oct
  • 17

Who’s Spending What and Where? Latest Media Spend Trends

It’s the conundrum facing all marketers, and it’s one that’s becoming ever more pressing as marketing becomes increasingly results focused – how should I be proportioning my marketing spend to achieve maximum return on investment?

Of course, the answer is different for every product and brand, but one useful input into this process is ‘what is everybody else doing?’ and it’s here that Ofcom’s recently released Communication Report for 2011 can help.

The report, produced annually, examines a wide range of communication trends from media consumption habits to smartphone adoption. It also includes figures from a wide range of sources which analyse advertising spend by media from 2005 to 2010. Here are the key findings:

- Spend on internet advertising, including search, display and classified, has more than trebled proportionally since 2005, from 8% of overall spend to 26% in 2010.

In the first year of the recession, between 2008 and 2009, it was the only spend category which grew in absolute terms, overtaking TV to become the largest single spend category in 2009 – a position it retained (but only just) in 2010.

Throughout the 5 year period, most of the growth has been driven by increased search spend, which has not only grown in absolute terms each year between 2005 and 2010 but has also grown as a proportion of overall online spend – from 56% in 2005 to 61% in 2009.

Internet_Advertising_Spend_by_Category

Expenditure on search advertising grew yet again between 2009 and 2010, by 9%, but for the first time its share of internet ad spending fell – from 61% to 57%. This proportional fall was driven by the phenomenal growth of online display advertising. In 2010, online display ad revenues increased by 33%, driven entirely by the growth in Facebook advertising. Facebook accounted for over 41% of all online display advertising in 2010. Online advertising expenditure across other media actually fell by 3%. 

- So which sectors have been losing out as marketers shift their budgets online?

Well, it’s not TV, which has proven to be exceedingly resilient. TV advertising revenues enjoyed their best year last year since 2005, buoyed by the World Cup, and TV still commands 26% of overall spend (compared to 25% in 2005).

The main losers have been newspaper and magazine advertising. The former is down from 30% of overall spend in 2005 to 21% in 2010 and the latter down from 12% to 7% in the same period.

UK_Advertising_Expenditure_by_Category

Given the sharp falls in circulations seen by newspapers in particular, these falls in spend are hardly surprising. What is frustrating for the publishing industry is that they haven’t been able to reap the full benefit of the growth in online display advertising as Facebook has stolen their thunder. It’s no wonder that the advent of the tablet computer is seen by many in the industry as a means to claw back not only subscription revenues but ad revenues too.

- So are mobile ad revenues growing as fast as publishers would like them to? Well, they’re growing rapidly, but from a very small base.

Mobile advertising revenues almost doubled in 2010 from £36.7m to £83m but the mobile advertising market ended the year only 2% of the size of the overall internet ad market.

Search based advertising drove most of this growth from a volume perspective, growing by 172% in 2010 and growing its share of overall mobile marketing from 54% to 66%.

Mobile display advertising may be losing share, probably due to the limitations of screen size when viewing advertising on mobile phones in particular, although ads do dominate more page real estate than their PC-viewed competitors.  The growth of the tablet market, both through the established market leading iPad and new entrants such as the Kindle Fire may do something to redress the balance.

The other interesting fact about mobile advertising is that its client base is becoming broader. A discipline dominated by the entertainment and media sector, accounting for 66% of spend in 2009, is now much more diversified with sectors such as Finance, Consumer Goods and Automotive seeing significantly increased spends.

Top_5_Mobile_Advertising_Sectors

In general, Ofcom’s report shows that brands are still probably more wedded to ‘old media’ than perhaps they should be, particularly premium and luxury brands whose affluent consumers are more likely than the mass of the population to be consuming their media online, be it via their PC or mobile device. Progressive brands such as Burberry are reported to be as spending as much as 60% of their on digital – well above the average.

But offline media still has a role to play in delivering impact, tangibility and in being ‘interruptive’ in a way that consumers are accustomed to and comfortable with.

It’s not all about conversion at the bottom end of the purchase funnel – offline media can play a vital and very effective role in driving prospects into the funnel in the first place. The key is to understand your audience, what media they consume and how, understand your product and the best environment in which to showcase it and understand exactly what your competitors are doing. Of course, collecting data on what is driving sales is key – but as you’re likely to be recording only what is happening at the sharp end of the purchase funnel it’s just one of the factors you should be taking into account.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Oct
  • 17

TV Delivers Greater RoI Than Any Other Media

TV_Advertising_Delivers_Greatest_RoINew research published last week claims that TV advertising delivers a greater return on investment than radio, press, online static display or outdoor.

The study, commissioned by Thinkbox, the marketing body for commercial TV in the UK, found that TV advertising returned £1.70 in profit for every £1 spent compared to £1.48 for radio, £1.40 for press, £1.06 for online static display and just 45p for outdoor.

Despite the recession, TV advertising’s RoI was found to be 22% higher than it was 5 years ago, due to the fact that its effectiveness had remained unchanged during a period in which its prices had fallen. 

When it came to generating sales uplift, the study found TV advertising even further ahead of the pack – 2.5 times more effective than its nearest rival. Press advertising was found to generate just 37% of the sales uplift of TV, radio 19%, online static display 15% and outdoor 9%. 

In addition, the research found that TV advertising also increased the effectiveness of other media – radio effectiveness was observed to increase by up to 100% if booked with TV, and branded search effectiveness increased by up to 35%. 

So what should premium and luxury marketers make of these findings?

Well, there are some specific anomalies in the research which raise questions marks. Why was only ‘online static display’ analysed, rather than the much more effective interactive versions?  And why was outdoor advertising analysed in isolation when, often, it’s main role is to support campaigns in other media? 

It’s also a little frustrating that the research, despite analysing over 3,000 campaigns across 9 advertising sectors, has only resulted in consolidated results, and that the findings have not been split out by sector. 

And, of course, a slight scepticism always has to be applied when an industry body’s commissioned research miraculously, and unsurprisingly, discovers that its form of advertising is highly effective. 

But despite such suspicions, many of ThinkBox’s findings make sense.

Ofcom’s recent Communication Report found that despite the plethora of competing media activities, people are now watching more TV than they did 5 years ago – perhaps driven by social budgets being trimmed in the recession. During the same period, radio consumption has remained largely static and press consumption has declined marketedly.  As a result, it’s likely that TV advertising effectiveness has increased during a period when that of it’s rivals has at best remained static. 

However, for us, the key takeout from this is the role that offline advertising, be it in TV, radio, press or outdoor, still has to play in the media mix. 

The decision on which medium (or media) to chose for any given campaign will depend on a mix of factors dependent on audience, environment, product and message, but offline media is still the most effective way to take a brand’s message to mass audiences. 

And above the line media still has a vital role to play in driving prospects into the top of the purchase funnel, allowing other disciplines, such as search, to become more effective in converting that interest into actual purchases. 

In an era when marketers in all sectors are having to become increasingly RoI focused, disciplines which deliver easily observable return on investment are hoovering up ever greater proportions of marketing spends. The danger in this approach is that spend gets focused at the narrower ‘conversion’ end of the funnel because that’s where RoI can be best observed. The lack of above the line spend means that fewer prospects get driven into the funnel in the first place – RoI then drifts as that ’sharp end’ spend has to work ever harder to convert fewer prospects. 

Research such as that commissioned by ThinkBox is an invaluable tool in a marketer’s armoury when justifying spend others may deem to be frivilous but marketers know is playing a vital role in creating sales uplift and profitability.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Oct
  • 4

Kindle Fire Takes Aim at Apple’s iPad (or Does It?)

Kindle_FireApple’s iPad has been unassailable in the category it created almost 18 months ago. Despite the efforts of competitors such as HP, RIM and Sony, the iPad still commands 67% of the tablet market. The no.2 slot is filled by Samsung’s Galaxy Tab with a paltry 7% market share.

But with Amazon’s announcement of their Kindle Fire last week, could Apple finally have a genuine challenger?

On initial impressions, the Fire is no iPad.  For a start, there’s no camera or microphone and no 3G connectivity, just wifi.  And from an aesthetic perspective, Amazon clearly can’t match Apple’s design prowess – the Fire is built for functionality rather than form.

But then again, the Fire does have a couple of notable advantages over its more established rival.

Firstly, there’s the media options at it’s users’ fingertips. Apple has it’s App Store and iTunes but Amazon has access to a vast array of convenient media options – magazines, books, music and movies. And Amazon understands vastly more about us than Apple does – as soon as someone purchases a Kindle Fire and registers their account, Amazon will understand precisely their media preferences and will be able to offer them a plethora of highly relevant and tempting media for their new device.

Secondly, with a retail price of just $199, the Fire is less than half the price of a iPad, which costs $500 for even the most basic model.

And those 2 points underline the strategy behind the launch of the Kindle Fire.  It’s not trying to take on the ‘luxury’ end of the tablet market – a section of the market where even rivals with better technical offerings have failed to take on a brand as powerful as Apple. This is the ‘business’ end of the market, where users are not just looking for media consumption but functionality that makes their working lives easier.

Amazon are trying to dominate, or perhaps even create, the ‘entry level’ tablet market – a section of the market that is purely about play, not work.  The fact that the device is branded ‘Kindle’ at all is a clue – this is a step up from Amazon’s highly successful range of ereaders, a device on which purchasers will not be restricted to purchasing books only, but magazines, movies and music too.

And with rumours abounding that Amazon is pricing the Fire at less than cost, the profit potential of the device clearly lies in it being a conduit for Amazon to sell us lots of different media.

Despite the fact that it will only be sold in the US initially, market commentators expect somewhere between 2 and 5m Fires to sell by the end of the year.  No-one’s expecting it to outsell the iPad, although if it does ‘democratize’ the tablet market as it’s been designed to do, it’s not inconceivable that it, or it’s antecedents, could eventually gain the no.1 slot.

For publishers and advertisers, it’s likely to make the tablet market more commercially attractive in the long run. 

If this new entry is a success, more and more people will become used to consuming media on tablet devices rather than on their home PCs.  As publishers have already set the precedent that their content is available at a premium on mobile devices, and as this device comes with a convenient ‘news stand’ store, there is the potential to sell subscriptions to new audiences and to create new revenues.

For premium and luxuy advertisers, tablets already offer an excellent environment to showcase their offerings, with large format and interactive advertising, but the Kindle Fire could well broaden the market beyond the predominantly young, male and suited core market for the iPad.

It will be at least 12 months before the Fire is available in the UK, but premium and luxury brands would be well advised to start looking at what part these devices could play in moving their customers along the purchase cycle. With the Fire launched and Microsoft’s tablet offering still to come, the tablet market is really starting to hot up.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Oct
  • 4

Facebook’s Changes: What Premium & Luxury Marketers Need to Know

Facebook_TimelineIf one thing has been constant in Facebook’s short history it’s that the world’s pre-eminent social network is always changing – and change was on the agenda again at Facebook’s recent f8 developer conference.

However, this year’s changes were focused on one goal – dwell time.

With 800m users and growing, Facebook’s leadership team have clearly moved their focus from growth to finding ways of keeping users on the site for as long as possible. As any online publishers will tell you,  people doing more and spending longer on a site means more ad inventory to sell, and more ad inventory means more revenue.

So what changes is Facebook implementing and what opportunities will they create for premium and luxury brands? Let’s go through them in turn:

‘Timelines’

Users’ existing profiles are being replaced with ’Timelines’. 

The new timeline is designed to make available a user’s full history of interaction on Facebook - status updates,  photos posted, apps used and places visited (via Facebook Places).  A user’s timeline will be created automatically by Facebook but they will have the ability to add their own content to to ‘fill out’ their new profile – all the way back to their birth if they so desire.

From a user’s perspective, the change will allow people to create more personalised and deeper profiles that better reflect their own personalities and histories. From Facebook’s perspective, the fact that users will be adjusting their timelines and investigating their friends’ timeslines will mean more time spent on the site. And, of course, all the additional content that’s added by users personalising their timelines will be invaluable to advertisers looking to more precisely target their advertising offerings. 

At present, timelines are only being rolled out to individual users but there have been hints that the change could be introduced to brand pages too in the future. This raises interesting possibilities for premium and luxury brands in particular, offering them an ideal opportunity to explain more of their ‘back story’  and heritage to potential fans.

‘Facebook Gestures’

Despite the ubiquitous nature of the ‘Like’ button, Facebook has acknowledged that it’s not appropriate for all occasions. So partners and developers will soon be able customise the button to include any verb that is appropriate.

So instead of ‘Like’ing, Facebook users could be ‘Read’ing (newspaper or magazine articles or books), ‘Listen’ing’ (to music) or ‘Watch’ing (TV or movies). 

The introduction of more relevant verbs for social sharing buttons could see an explosion in their usage - potentially annoying for friends who’ll see more of this sort of activity in their newsfeeds but further excellent data for premium and luxury advertisers when defining audiences for their advertising.

More sharing means more peer influencing – buying books that friends are reading or downloading music that others are listening to. And there’s also the opportunity for brands to more overtly grease the wheels of social commerce – for example, by adding ‘Want’ buttons to sites so users can build up their own wishlists of products for special occasions or birthdays. In addition, these greater opportunities for user and brand interaction will create more relevant content for the sponsored stories ad format - giving brands greater opportunty to effectively ’spread the word’ virally to the friends of their fans.

Media Partnerships

One way to get users to spend more time on your site is to give them less reasons to leave it. Facebook has done exactly that by signing up a raft of media partners so users can watch TV (on Hulu), listen to music (on Spotify) and read the news (on the Guardian or The Indie) without having to leave the site.

The benefit of this innovation is not just in the extra time Facebook users will spend on the site but all the extra data that will be gathered on users media preferences and the way they interact with that media. The movies people watch, the music they listen to and the articles they read can tell advertisers alot about whether a particular user is of the correct profile for their product, allowing Facebook advertising to become even more targeted.

The Ticker

Facebook has recognised that the more interactive that users become with the service, the more their friends newsfeeds will become clogged up with information which isn’t that important or interesting – like a friend’s progress in Farmville, for example.

So all of this ‘background information’, particularly interactions with apps, will migrate to a ‘ticker’ – a real time rolling feed of what a user’s Facebook friends are doing at that very moment.

Of course, the fact that it’s real time gives users the opportunity to do things together. As interactions with Facebook’s new media partners will be shared via the ‘ticker’, friends could listen to music or watch movies together, using the chat feature to compare notes as they go.

And premium and luxury brands could create apps to leverage this oportunity for real time interaction – allowing friends to go on virtual shopping trips together for example. 

 

For premium and luxury advertisers, there’s much to welcome about the changes that Facebook have introduced.  They’ll be more inventory available, at least in the short term, and a richer pool of user data to mine to more precisely target advertising offerings.

But they’ll also be more opportunities for brands to engage with users, and greater rewards for brands that seize those opportunities. 

Just as Facebook has changed it’s emphasis from building a following to deeper interaction with its users, so brands will be rewarded for changing their strategy too – from a focus on ‘Likes’ to a focus on meaningful engagement. The challenge will be in dreaming up ways to more deeply interact with fans – to become part of of their daily experience of Facebook. To fail risks becoming an irrelevance on the world’s leading social network, and as Facebook grows and dominates more of its users time online, that’s not a place that many brands will want to go.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess