Cream

News

Follow Us

Archive for May, 2012

  • May
  • 29

5 Mobile Marketing Facts You Need to Know

5_Mobile_Marketing_Facts_You_Need_to_KnowIf there’s one channel that’s dominating our clients’ thinking  at the moment, it’s mobile.

Mobile marketing may or may not be a forefront of your thinking, but it should be. If you’re not convinced, or there are others in your organisation that you need to convince, we’ve compiled our 5 ‘must know’ facts about mobile marketing which we think make a compelling case:

1. 54% of UK consumers own a smartphone

It’s a fact that there are now more consumers in the UK market with smartphones than those without them – the tipping point has been reached.  Compare that with just 27% who owned one in March 2011 (Ofcom) and you can see that penetration has doubled in one year. And that pace of adoption shows no signs of letting up.

2. 91% of smartphone owners have their phones within reach 24/7

According to a Morgan Stanley study in 2011, the vast majority of smartphone owners have the phone within reach all of the time.  There is no other marketing channel – offline or online – which gives marketers such broad and such constant access to their target market.  

3. 90% of all mobile searches lead to action.

Clearly, any sort of search activity demonstrates intent on behalf of the consumer, but mobile searches demonstrate a more immediate intent than those which take place on a PC.  70% of mobile searches lead to action within 1 hour – that compares to 70% of online searches that lead to action within 1 month.

Consumers searching on mobile have an appetite to find out about your products and services now, and will probably swiftly move on to other actions such as purchase. Hence, investing in mobile marketing can deliver excellent, and fast, RoI.

4. 61% of mobile searches and 52% of mobile ads views  lead to phone calls

Unsurprisingly perhaps, given the primary purpose of smartphones, mobile marketing is an exceptionally good way of generating phone calls.  And phone calls are an action that retailers should be encouraging - conversion rates are 10 times higher on the phone than they are from a visit to a landing page.

5. 72% of UK smartphone owners have purchased on their mobile

Not only have nearly 3/4 of smartphone owners purchased on their mobile but the value of what they’re purchasing on their phones is growing at a rapid rate too – up 254% year on year. Mobile commerce isn’t something that’s coming in the future – it’s already here.

In revenue terms at least, the impact of mobile commerce may be small at present. That may convince premium and luxury brand marketers that they can leave mobile investment for another year and see how things develop.  But we believe such an approach would be flawed. 

Firstly, the sooner brands invest the sooner they know what works for them and what doesn’t. Secondly, there is a cost benefit of getting into mobile now – current interaction rates on mobile are very high so relative efficiency is greater and we expect this to level out over time.  And finally, this channel is growing at such a rapid rate that premium and luxury brands that don’t start investing effort into the mobile space right now are going to be swept away as the market grows exponentially in the next 12 months.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Neil Cunningham

  • May
  • 29

Look Launches ‘Look What I’m Wearing’

Look_Launches_Look_What_I'm_WearingIn an innovative foray into content crowdsourcing, IPC’s weekly fashion title, Look magazine has launched ‘Look What I’m Wearing.’

The idea is simple – readers take photos of what they are wearing and upload the pictures to the ‘Look What I’m Wearing’ section of the look.co.uk website.  Other readers can then browse these uploaded ‘looks’ by category (summer, party, casual etc), by fashion brand or by clothing type (shoes, dresses, tops etc), and even click thru to the fashion retailers site to purchase the items themselves.

And as the site includes features to integrate with Facebook and Twitter, visitors are able to like and comment on images uploaded by other users and discover where they’ve purchased their outfits.

There’s integration with the offline publication too – each week the editorial team at Look choose a selection of photos and publish them in the next week’s edition of the magazine.

Julie Lavington, Publishing Director at Look, explaining the inspiration for the initiative, said: “We know from research that women look to other women for fashion inspiration, and we’re tapping in to this with Look What I’m Wearing. It will be a major new franchise, providing a daily online destination, a weekly event in print and snackable content on our social networks.”

Of course, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen this sort of thing. Look may have derived inspiration from rival More Magazine’s community of Moreos on Facebook. And the success of Look’s own ‘Friday Night Hair’ was probably a key stepping stone en route to the launch of ‘Look What I’m Wearing.’ 

However, clearly the team at Look hope this will become a permanent and prominent part of their online and offline strategy. And of course they have a ‘captive’ audience of 0.6m weekly readers to promote it to.

If it takes off, and 14 new ‘looks’ were uploaded on their website last Sunday, then from an advertiser’s perspective, it could make the website a more attractive advertising proposition.  Readers keen to check out the latest ‘street styles’ will visit the site more often and for longer, boosting visitor numbers and average visit length.

It also provides a useful anecdotal research tool for fashion brands – to see who’s wearing their styles and what they’re wearing them with – and a potentially useful source of traffic, with the clickable links through to fashion retailers’ sites.

And if it’s a success, we may see other fashion publications launching similar offerings. And considering the insight that initiatives such as this offer to fashion marketers, and the potential they offer to drive new traffic to their sites, that’s probably no bad thing.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carrie Millard

  • May
  • 29

Is Facebook Advertising a Waste of Money?

Facebook-IPOClearly, Facebook’s much awaited IPO didn’t exactly go to plan.

First, there was the news that GM, one of the world’s largest advertisers, was pulling their $10m Facebook ad spend. Whilst remaining committed to Facebook as a means of engaging with their fans via their various branded pages, GM had clearly decided that Facebook wasn’t generating the required returns and they could get more for their investment by allocating it elsewhere.

Then, post IPO, Facebook’s stock didn’t soar as many had expected. On day 1, the companies underwriters were forced to step in to stop the shares from falling below the $38 offer price. By day 2, shares had fallen 12% in early trading.

Clearly, we have to put things into perspective. Most of us would like a bit of ‘failure’ Facebook style, if failure means a stock market price that values the company at 100 times earnings and turns its founders into billionnaires.

However, GM’s very public pull out has led many, including investors, to question the long term growth potential of Facebook advertising. Can advertising revenues climb fast enough and far enough to justify such a loft evaluation?  In short, is Facebook advertising a sound investment for companies or should more, as GM have done, be pulling up their advertising tent and pitching it elsewhere?

Here are some points to consider when reviewing your own Facebook advertising spend:

If You’re Going to Judge Facebook Advertising on Traditional RoI or CPA Measures, You’re Probably Going to be Disappointed

And this is probably how GM have been judging it, hence the decision to pull out and re-allocate the spend to other digital budgets that are delivering demonstrable return.  But this can be a dangerous game – ‘not all that can be counted counts and not all that counts can be counted.’ An automotive purchase, like many luxury buys, is a considered and complex one and Facebook is often working right at the top of the purchase funnel. Just because it’s not generating click thrus doesn’t mean it’s not influential. It’s interesting to note that just as GM is pulling out of Facebook, Ford announced that it’s increasing its spend.

Facebook Advertising is a New Phenomenon and Advertisers and Consumers are Still Getting Used to It

Many advertisers may not be reaching their full potential on Facebook because they’re still getting to grips with advertising in a new medium. it’s certainly a very different environment to the standard publisher’s site and different techniques and rewards are required.  Likewise, Facebook users are still getting used to interacting with brands on Facebook. But engagement is growing – a recent study showed that the number of UK consumers engaging with brands via Facebook has almost doubled since August 2011. As more fans engage, and see the benefits of engaging, so more will be open to Facebook advertising.

We Don’t Know What’s Happening Post Impression

Those of you that have been reading our articles on online advertising will know that the research points to most online ad-prompted actions happening post impression. In fact, studies have suggested CTR can sometimes be a very misleading measure of an ad’s effectiveness in terms of influencing brand preference and the eventual sale. As a form of online advertising, it’s very likely that many of these factors apply to Facebook advertising too – its having an impact on brand metrics but not necessarily generating immediate action.

Word of Mouth is the Most Powerful Marketing Tool and Facebook Advertising Leverages Word of Mouth

Facebook is a powerful tool for creating engagement and advocacy amongst fans. And Facebook advertising is an excellent means of leveraging that word of mouth to win new fans who can be turned into customers using formats such as sponsored stories. And there’s no more effective way to win new customers than via word of mouth.

Facebook Advertising Can Generate Insight

Brands can often have a false perception of their target market. Facebook advertising can be hugely enlightening in understanding who customers and potential customers really are by looking at response and engagement rates for different audiences.

F-Commerce May Change the Landscape

Facebook users show reticence to take any action that takes them away from the social network – an extra barrier in the way of generating measurable action and hard results from Facebook advertising campaigns.  Should F-commerce become more widespread – and it’s a big ‘if’ considering brands’ preferences to drive consumers to their own, more controllable, ecommerce destinations – then we might see more of a direct correlation between Facebook advertising and sales.

So, as you’ll have gathered, we think it’s much too early to call time on Facebook advertising yet – it still offers many benefits to brands and has much untapped potential.

Whether Facebook can justify it’s lofty valuation in the future will depend it’s ability to successfully appeal to SME’s – the drivers behind the success of Google’s search and ad network. But for larger brands with advocates to leverage, we believe it’s usefulness has already been proven.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Neil Cunningham

  • May
  • 14

Which Fashion Brands Perform Best in Search?

Whether they’re looking for a party dress to impress or simply a new pair of jeans, many consumer purchase journeys in fashion start with a search engine.

That’s why it’s important for fashion brands, retailers and etailers to be competitive in this key online field, especially when recessionary pressures make competition in the fashion sector so fierce.

So we read with interest a new piece of research from digital agency I Spy into the performance of the sector’s protagonists in both the fields of natural and paid for search.

Their methodology for their natural search analysis was to look at 72 generic fashion terms – like ‘boots’, ‘cardigan’ and ‘lingerie’ – and then to rank the top 30 websites by the number of keywords they held a top 10 position for. The results are below.

Natural_Search_Performance_in_Fashion_Sector1

Top spot was claimed by ASOS, with a remarkable 66 ‘top 10s’, followed by Amazon and Debenhams. On the whole, the list was dominated by etailers, department stores and high street retailers, with fashion brands and luxury players notable by their absence, with the exception of Net-a-Porter at position 7.

Of course, a page 1 ranking is good, but any fashion retailer worth their salt will be aiming for a no.1 ranking – estimated to generate up to 40% for the traffic for any given SERPs page. I Spy’s report also ranked the top 30 websites by the number of no.1 rankings and ASOS triumphed once again with New Look in 2nd place.

Natural_Search_Performance_in_Fashion_Sector2

Of course, for brands that struggle to compete in natural search, paid search offers a solution. Here, the study split the generic terms into 3 broad categories – womenswear, menswear and luxury – to see how the various players in the market performed.

For womenswear, etailer Marisota topped the list with 83% coverage of terms in the category. On the whole, etailers dominated again – perhaps a reflection of how much harder they have to work online to compensate for their lack of an offline presence – although niche brands such as Boden and Anthropologie also performed strongly.

Paid_Search_Results_Womenswear

The menswear sector was dominated by Marks & Spencer with 66% coverage, followed by Premierman and Amazon. Reiss also performed surprisingly well in this category, as did TM Lewin.

Paid_Search_Results_Menswear

The luxury category was surprisingly led by Mainline Menswear, and unsurprisingly followed by that most digitally savvy of luxury brands, Burberry. Discount retailers such as BrandAlley and Outnet showed themselves keen to grab a slice of this market, as did young fashion etailer Very.

Paid_Search_Rankings_Luxury_Fashion

The main learnings from this study have been the notable absence of any significant number of fashion brands in general, and premium and luxury fashion brands in particular. In general, both natural and paid search results have been dominated by etailers, department stores and high street retailers.

Whilst clearly all fashion players have something to learn from the natural search performance of ASOS, premium and luxury brands in particular can use the argument that the study, by focusing on generic terms, biased the results against them. Surely, it makes sense for them to concentrate on nicher, longer tail terms to achieve the required return on their search investment?

This may be true but generic searches often represent the start of the purchase process. Brands that ‘opt out’ of this market may be missing a golden opportunity to place themselves in the consideration set right at the top of the purchase funnel. Hence, targeting generic terms may not deliver immediate sales, but by generating awareness at the beginning of a consumer’s purchase decision, they can be effective in making a balanced search strategy much more effective.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Neil Cunningham

  • May
  • 14

Is NFC the Future of Interactive Out of Home?

As we’ve outlined previously, consumers are increasingly embracing out of home creatives that offer interactivity via smartphones.

A recent survey by Clear Channel and Posterscope backs up that finding.  Their study found that 23% of consumers had interacted with a poster advert using their smartphone – 2nd only to print adverts (28%). And they’re not only interacting – the survey found that they were enjoying the experience too (84% of those that had interacted) and recommending it to their friends too (72%).

At present, the dominant interactive technology is QR codes, with 2/3s of the sample having used them. This compared to only 20% who had used mobile barcode scanners (in 2nd place) and 7% that had used Bluetooth (in 3rd) to interact with ads.

However, one of the least used interactive mobile technologies, NFC – only 3% of the sample had used it to interact with advertising - is the one which arguably holds most potential for outdoor advertisers.

NFC, or Near Field Communications, is a wireless technology that allows individuals  to make transactions and exchange digital content with other NFC-enabled devices.  In 2011, just 5% of phones were NFC-enabled but a recent report released by MarketResearch.com predicted that by 2016 this figure would be up to 50%. 

The other problem with NFC is that it’s very little known – 2/3s of consumers don’t know if their phone has NFC and even 60% of smartphone owners who’s phone has NFC are unaware.

So why does a technology with low levels of penetration, low levels of awareness and low levels of usage offer such potential to out of home advertisers? Well, for a couple of reasons.

First of all, there’s the ease of use.  Just by tapping their NFC-enabled phone to the NFC-enabled poster when invited to do so, consumers can carry out a variety of actions from downloading vouchers to getting directions (e.g. to a local store) or liking a brand’s Facebook page. No need to download apps or take photographs with a phone camera as for QR codes.

Secondly, NFC is a technology that offers this potential almost exclusively to out of home as an advertising medium.  Digital out of home sites can be NFC-enabled – TVs and newspapers cannot.

But NFC’s greatest potential lies in its usage as a wireless payment technology. Combine this with NFC-enabled poster sites and you have an interesting possibility – the ability to purchase direct from a poster site. In fact, 57% of the Clear Channel/Posterscope sample would be prepared to purchase products from a NFC-enabled poster using their smartphone.

When this subject was further probed in the survey, there didn’t seem to be a product category that consumers wouldn’t consider buying from a poster – including clothing, beauty/personal grooming products and even flights. In fact, many saw the convenience of purchasing ‘on the go’ and then collecting the product in store or having it delivered.

However, before this vision is reached, NFC does have to overcome some barriers, and not just its lack of awareness. 30% of the sample wouldn’t use NFC-enabled poster sites – mainly because they weren’t convinced by the utility but also because of fears over security.

Nonetheless, NFC does offer some interesting possibilities to premium and luxury advertisers, not least the opportunity to turn billboard sites into microstores that deliver a tangible commercial return. There are some significant barriers to overcome before adoption becomes significant – even amongst affluent consumers who tend to be at the forefront of the adoption of new technologies – but for premium and luxury brands, NFC does appear to be a technology to watch very closely.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Karen Stephenson