Cream

News

Follow Us

Author Archive

  • Feb
  • 7

Should Brands Be Interested in Pinterest?

Lands_End_on_PinterestIt happens pretty regularly these days – a new social service is trumpeted across the marketing media as the next big thing.  Most fizzle, or remain mired in only a small niche of users.  But every now and again, one comes along that has real potential, and Pinterest falls into that category. 

So what is it exactly? 

In marketing speak, it’s a visual curation tool. In plain English, it’s a service which allows its users to create virtual mood or pinboards and share them with others. 

The first hurdle to overcome for interested users is that it’s an invitation only service at present. Once users have been invited by an existing user and are signed up, they can share photos that they find online (or create themselves) by ‘pinning’ them (much like a ‘Like’ on Facebook or a +1 on Google.) As long as they’ve downloaded the toolbar, users can ‘pin’ images and videos from any website and the picture will appear on their Pinterest board. Once ‘pinned’, items can be used to create a number of themed ‘boards’, and followers of that user can ‘re-pin’ items to their own boards. Users can also share their boards on other social networks such as Twitter and Facebook. 

How is it used?  Well, at present in any function where a mood board is a useful tool – so by designers collecting and demonstrating ideas for schemes, by fashionistas creating looks, by families sharing tips like recipes and useful products, by brides-to-be collecting ideas for their weddings etc. 

And why is it attracting so much attention?  Well for 2 reasons. 

Firstly, between September and December last year, Pinterest grew from 1.68m unique users to 7.21m – an increase of 369%.  Other reports suggest that up to 5m people are logging in per day and spending an average of 14 mins on the site. Whatever the exact figures, everyone agrees it’s growing rapidly. 

The other aspect of Pinterest that’s really capturing the attention of brands is the amount of referral traffic Pinterest is generating.  Figures from the Shareaholic survey for January ‘12 found Pinterest just behind Twitter in referrals, having driven 3.6% of referral traffic in the month compared to Twitter’s 3.61%. That puts Pinterest ahead of services with significantly bigger followings like Google+ and LinkedIn, hence making it a platform with potential to create real user engagement and drive real business. 

Opportunities abound for brands on this platform, as long as they think creatively and don’t use it merely as another mini website.  Fashion and beauty brands might create boards to demonstrate different looks, or might use the platform to showcase the looks that their customers have created. Or boards might be created around different customer groups or occasions – party frocks, summer wedding etc. Pinterest also allows users to add prices and link back to ecommerce sites. 

Pinterest also has potential for competitions – such as Lands Ends’ ‘Pin It to Win It’ – and for crowdsourcing, like asking followers to create boards of their favourite clothes, or to photograph themselves in their favourite outfits and pin them. 

But any brand that is interested in participating needs to understand the demographics of Pinterest users initially.

At present, it’s heavily female dominated (80/20), with a bias towards lower incomes (most are in the $25-$75K category) and families – so fashion, jewellery and beauty brands with accessible offerings will see the potential. We’ve seen no figures yet on the UK following and it would be fair to say Pinterest is primarily a US phenomena – although trends have a habit of spreading rapidly across the Atlantic.  And even the top brands on the platform only number a few thousand followers, albeit numbers are growing fast and those followers seem to be highly engaged as the referral traffic demonstrates. 

So Pinterest is not for every premium and luxury brand, and some of the oportunities that Pinterest allows brands – such as to create themed pages – could be easily transplanted to brands’ ecommerce sites where they will probably have greater impact. 

But it’s certainly one to keep a close eye on and – if the demographic appeals and you can secure an invitation – to have a dabble with.  For brands with highly visual products and with creativity at their core, it could be a highly effective platform for promotion.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Jan
  • 24

Facebook Update – Timeline Apps and Featured Stories

Artfinder_App_on_Facebook_TimelinesDespite being announced at the f8 Developers’ Conference in September, Facebook’s new timelines – a new way to present profiles from birth until the present – didn’t start to roll out in earnest until December.  However, the momentum of those changes gathered pace with the announcement of the release of 60 new timeline apps last week.

With the new apps, offered by the likes of travel review site TripAdvisor, the recipe network Foodily and film review site Rotten Tomatoes - people will be able to personalise their timelines dependent on their interests.  And once the user has loaded the app and decided what they’re going to share with who, their timelines will automatically be updated with their activity in that app in real time.

The potential rewards for brands are obvious. As apps are used, they create a constant stream of viral marketing messages that appear in friends newsfeeds and tickers.  Spotify’s music app is a prime example – one of Facebook’s original timeline partners, the music streaming site has netted an estimated 7m new subscribers since its launch. And Facebook announced with the release of these new apps that the door is now open for any brand to develop and submit their own app.

Even if brands don’t create their own apps, there may well be benefits to using existing apps for marketing purposes if they have an established Facebook audience.  Private galleries might share, or encourage visitors to share, their collections on art sharing app Artfinder,  food brands might create and share their own recipes on Foodily etc.

In addition to this development, Facebook has also announced the rollout of a new form of advertising – Featured Stories.  Featured Stories will work in the same way as Sponsored Stories – the ads will only appear to those people who’s Facebook friends have interacted with the advertiser.  But Featured Stories will appear, clearly flagged, in the friends’ newsfeeds rather than in one of the advertisng slots on the right hand side of the screen.

Featured Stories will be carefully rationed, at least at first, to one per newsfeed per day but it will be interesting to see what impact they have on click thru rates.  Featured Stories also open up the possibility of advertising to Facebook’s growing market of mobile users, although mobile users won’t be included in the initial roll out.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Jan
  • 10

7 Ways to Maximise the Performance of Your Online Display Campaign

Clients of Cream will be familiar with MediaMind  and their digital advertising solutions. MediaMind also publishes regular studies into the effectiveness of online advertising and their latest research, entitled ‘7 best practices for building a smart ad’, is one of their most comprehensive to date.  It’s the result of the analysis of over 300,000 ad creatives and over 1 billion ad impressions with the aim of discovering which environments and which creative treatments work best.

But before we discuss their recommendations, it’s worth introducing you to 2 specific measurement concepts which MediaMind has pioneeered. 

The first is dwell rate, which describes the proportion of impressions that have engaged with a rich media ad – be that by touch, interaction or click.  The second is dwell time, that being defined as the duration of the dwell, in seconds, for users who engaged.

MediaMind has found dwell rate and dwell time to be more indicative of the impact of an ad than the traditional metric of CTR as much of the user activity in reaction to an online ad occurs ‘post impression’.  MediaMind’s own studies have found that users who were exposed to campaigns with high dwell were 3 times more likely to search for a brand related keyword as compared to those who were exposed to campaigns with low dwell.

In addition, campaigns with high dwells boosted advertisers’ site traffic by 69% on average and improved page views and time spent on the site.

So armed with dwell rate and dwell time as our primary measures of ad impact, let’s look at MediaMind’s 7 recommendations:

1. Use Video

Using video ad formats increases dwell rate by 22% because the movement of the video attracts the user’s eye away from the largely ’static’ content of the publisher’s page.  And because video allows the user to stay with the ad for longer, video ads also enjoy an 11% higher dwell time.

2. Initiate Your Video Automatically

If the movement of a video ad draws the eye, then it makes sense for this movement to begin automatically when the user hits the page rather than being user-initiated.  Auto initiated ads enjoy higher dwell rates and CTRs than their user-initiated counterparts.

3. Match the Ad with Site Creative

Contextual relevance is key – MediaMind’s study found that ads surrounded by relevant content saw sharp increases in performance. Not only is content a powerful indicator of intent, people are more likely to spend more time consuming specialist content, and are therefore more likely to notice and engage with ads.

4. Use Richer, More Visible Ad Formats

As a rule of thumb,MediaMind found that the richer the format, the higher the level of engagement (although this isn’t always the case – at Cream we’ve sometimes found that static campaigns can outperform flash campaigns).

Homepage takeovers, expandable banners, peelback banners and video extensions were found to increase the average dwell duration. Commercial breaks, floating ads and overlays commanded high attention from users and therefore resulted in higher dwell rates (albeit combined with lower dwell durations).

5. Use Synched Ads

Synching ads involves taking 2 different placements and creating one unified experience, and it’s an experience which creates impact without being too intrusive like some other rich media formats.  Both dwell rate and CTR were observed to increase, even when compared to running 2 different regular ads on the same page.

6. Take Advantage of Dynamic Creative Optimisation

This process involves the ad server combining different creative concepts with different copy treatments and serving the ad that delivers the greatest level of interaction from users – be that clicks, conversions, dwells or a combination of those actions.

Effectively, clients don’t have to make a call on which creative they believe will be the most effective as the ad server discovers that via trial and error and then focuses on the most effective execution.

Unsurprisingly, dyamically created campaigns saw a 6% increase in dwell rate and a 10% increase in dwell time.

7. Integrate Exchanges into your Media Buy

Incorporating ad exchanges into campaigns was found to boost return on investment and lower cost per conversion.

To help marketers digest these 7 practices, MediaMind have produced an infographic which we’ve included below.

The full report, which includes benchmarks for ad performance by region and country, can be downloaded here.

7_Ways_to_maximise_the_performance_of_your_online_display_campaign

 

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Dec
  • 12

How Important is Environment to Online Advertising?

How_Important_is_Environment_to_Online_Advertising

It’s the perennial online advertising conundrum for premium and luxury marketers – hand-pick the environment for your brand’s advertising or opt for an RoI driven, but blind, approach. 

Both arguments have their merits but as demands on marketers grow to deliver demonstrable results, the lure of performance-driven advertising becomes ever more irrisistable. 

So 2 pieces of research from AOL and the AOP released last week make for interesting reading. 

AOL’s study, which quizzed 1,200 consumers and was conducted in association with GfK NOP Media, found that environment was key in delivering the best engagement levels. Almost 1/3 (29%) of their respondents  said they would feel more positive about a brand if it was advertised on a site they trusted.  And once users felt they could trust a site, they were more likely to respond to advertising and buy the products advertised. 

AOL’s research found 4 factors crucial in building trust amongst users – good quality information, emotional attachment, prominent user involvement and modernity. Websites that ticked these 4 boxes were more likely to be visited regularly, to enjoy higher levels of participation and sharing and to be more fertile environments for advertisers.

The study by the AOP,  with a sample of 2,000 users and conducted in association with ComScore, shed greater light on which sites were more likely to be trusted and which weren’t. 

Their research found that 62% of users were more likely to trust advertising on original content sites – classified by them as the sites of UK newspapers, UK commercial TV and radio, UK magazines and trade or business publications. 52% were found to ‘trust’ advertising on portals (e.g. MSN, Yahoo) and just 32% trusted advertising on social networks. 

In addition, 41% of the respondents said advertising on original content sites was more relevant to them and of high quality, compared with just 19% on portals and 18% on social networks. Where trust in an online environment could be demonstrated, site visits to the advertiser’s brand site was increased by 37% on original content sites. 

Of course, advertising performance is not just based on trust in the environment – AOL’s study also underlined the importance of relevancy to site content and quality of the advertising itself – but trust clearly plays a key part, and probably more so for premium-priced products. 

The problem with taking a purely RoI based approach to online advertising is that decisions can be taken based on only part of the picture.  As we’ve discussed before, a great part of the relevance of online ads is the impact they have post impression on brand preference and favourability – factors which can result in ‘post impression’ visits to the advertiser’s website and factors which will be overlooked by taking a pure CTR or CPC based approach.

Of course, part of the RoI calculation is based on investment, and costs are higher in known online environments then when bought blind, but these 2 studies would suggest that brands should be hand-picking their online environments based on their authority and relevance, just as they do in the offline world.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess

  • Nov
  • 29

6 in 10 Britons Do Not Want to Engage with Brands Through Social Media

6_out_of_10_Britons_do_not_want_to_engage_with_brands_through_social_media

There’s been a debate raging about the value of social media activity for brands in the past couple of weeks.

The spark was some recent findings by TNS, the research body responsible for Digital Life, a global survey into the online behaviour of some 72,000 consumers across 60 countries.

TNS found that the majority of consumers in digital markets did not want to engage with brands via social media and that reticence to engage was at it’s highest in the UK, where 61% of consumers stated that they did not see social media as a place to interact with brands.

The survey also dealt an apparent blow to those contemplating a F-Commerce presence, with just 1/4 of respondents in developing countries seeing social networks as a place to buy products.

TNS’s own conclusion was summed up by it Chief Development Office, Matthew Froggatt:

 ’Many brands…are failing to understand that these spaces belong to the consumer and brand presence needs to be proportionate and justified….Misguided digital strategies are generating mountains of digital waste, from friendless Facebook accounts to blogs no-one reads.’

Additional research conducted by Edge Rank Checker seemed to drive another nail into the coffin of the notion that social media was an effective tool for marketers.  The study, conducted across 5,500 Facebook pages with more than 100,000 fans in October of this year, found that the average CTR of links shared by brands was 0.14% – that’s 1 click for every 714 impressions.  This may be a lot better than Facebook advertising and slightly better than online advertising, but is rather disappointing considering that Facebook fans should be more of a qualified audience given that fact they’ve opted in to receive those posts.

So are marketers wasting their time by trying to engage with customers and prospects via social media? We don’t think so, and it’s worth going back to the research to discover some of the reasons why.

For example, going back to TNS’s Digital Life research, 61% of consumers who don’t want to interact with brands via social media implies 39% that do – and 39% of the UK’s social media users is a pretty vast potential audience. And as more brands become involved in social media and offer consumers incentives for them to engage with them in this environment, that 39% is only going to increase.

The paltry CTR’s reported also tell only part of the story. Just because a post link isn’t being clicked on doesn’t mean it isn’t making an impression, in the same way that CTR is a poor way of measuring the effectiveness of online advertising.  And links are likely to get less clicks on Facebook because it’s users usually reticent to leave the social network.

However, where these studies do add value is to inject a dose of much needed realism into the social media debate.

Marketing is about identifying relevant target audiences and then selecting the channels that are most appropriate for the audience and the brand’s message.  Some brands seem to be throwing that thinking out of the window and taking a ‘channel first’ approach, deciding that they’re going to build a large following on twitter or Facebook without thinking whether the channel is appropriate for their message or whether their genuine prospects and customers are using that channel.

The danger is that brands can build followings who aren’t really in their target market, or are communicating via a channel which is not the best for what they’re trying to achieve.

Brands also need to realise that social media isn’t free – the time their staff spend posting and replying costs money too. Although social media is an emerging channel which surely has much unrealised potential in terms of RoI, no sensible debate can be had about its value to brands unless brands acknowledge the true investment they’re making in it.

The interactive nature of social media does present brands with an opportunity to build dialogue and advocacy with a proportion of their customers and prospects. But it is not the best solution for all customers and all tasks. Brands that realise this and use it with a balanced view of what it can achieve for their organisation are those likely to get the most out of it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Carla Burgess