Cream

News

Follow Us

Author Archive

  • Mar
  • 20

The Increasing Influence of Tablets

The_Increasing_Influence_of_TabletsTwo weeks after the launch of the iPad 3, dubbed ‘the new iPad’, seems like a good time to reflect on the growing influence of tablets in premium and luxury markets.

Tablet adoption, although well below the 50%+ penetration levels enjoyed by smartphones, is still growing rapidly. Deloittes recently reported 3m device owners, approximately 6% of the UK adult population – more than double the penetration in 2010.

But despite lagging well behind smartphones in numbers, the tablet is punching well above its weight when it comes to its influence on online advertising and ecommerce.

In terms of responsiveness to advertising, tablet owners are well ahead of their smartphone equivalents. A Nielsen study found that ad recall was higher than on smartphones - 72% had recalled seeing an ad on their tablet vs. 62% on their smartphone - and more users reached for their tablet (28%) than their smartphone (18%) to look up  a product after a seeing a TV ad.

In terms of ecommerce, a study by Logan Tod & Co., found tablets rivalling smartphones for their influence on ecommerce, with 14% of their survey having used a tablet to make a purchase for Christmas 2011 compared with 15% who had used their smartphone. In addition, an Adobe study found that tablet owners spent more on their devices than did smartphone (+54%) or PC users (+21%).

And with the iPad 3, and other developments in the tablet market in 2012, the influence of the tablet is set to grow.

The iPad 3’s HD screen, with 1m pixels more than a standard HD TV screen and a colour palette of 3m pixels, offers additional scope for premium and luxury advertisers to better showcase their wares, including via HD quality video. It’s 4G connectivity will offer increasing scope for fast, convenient shopping on the go when the UK’s mobile networks catch up with its technical spec – hopefully sometime next year. And the very fact it’s out in the market will drive down the price of the iPad 2, hence widening adoption in the tablet market.

The other significant development will be the launch of the UK version of the more accessibly priced Kindle Fire at a date yet to be confirmed this year, which will further deepen penetration of these devices within the UK market.

Our advice to premium and luxury marketers would be to pay close attention to their web stats – what proportion of their traffic is coming from tablets and what are those tablet users doing in the site should be the starting point for deciding whether a tablet optimised site is appropriate. If traffic is significant and the site has been optimised, there’s probably a case for some trials of iPad advertising or for developing iPad specific apps.

Even those for whom the stats don’t make a compelling case as yet should keep things monitored – tablets are far from killing the PC yet but the obituary is beginning to be written.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Mar
  • 20

5 Must Know Media Consumption Trends

5_Must_Know_Media_Consumption_Trends‘Tablet computers are now as likely to be found in the hands of over 55s as they are among the under 24s.’

That’s just one of the findings from the 6th annual ‘State of the Media Democracy Survey’, released by Deloitte this week.

The survey, which is as eagerly awaited in the Cream offices as the annual Ofcom Communications Report in August, is packed full of useful facts for marketers trying to pin down stats such as the level of smartphone adoption or the usage of tablet computers in the UK.

The survey is conducted each December (in this case December 2011) with a sample of just over 2000 respondents.  We’ve shared the most interesting of Deloitte’s findings with you below:

1. There are nearly 3m tablet owners in the UK, up from 1.3m in December 2010 - this would equate to c6% of the UK adult population.  As stated above, tablet adoption breaks the tradition that technology is first adopted by the young and then filters through to older age groups.  Perhaps the price point is a barrier in this case. Whatever the reason, tablet adoption is pretty evenly spread amongst age cohorts, with the 35-44 age groups showing the highest penetration at c20% – professionals at their earning peak, the same group that has most enthusiastically adopted Twitter.

2. Smartphone adoption is nearing 50% – smartphone adoption rates differ from survey to survey, mainly dependent on whether the survey uses a consumer definition of  a smartphone (as Deloitte do) or an industry one.  Here, the norm that the young are the early adopters is borne out by the figures – 60%+ of 14-34 year olds own one, compared to 58% of 35-44s, over 40% of 45-54s but less than 30% of 55+s. For both tablets and smartphones, men are more likely than women to own one, although women have caught up in the past 12 months and the figures are now fairly even.

In terms of how smartphones are being used in the purchase process, the Deloitte survey does shed a little light.  17% of the respondents had used their phone to ‘comparison shop’ whilst in-store and 18% had read product reviews, with both activities being regular (at least weekly) behaviours for those that had adopted them.

3. For magazines at least, print still has a future -  despite rising tablet ownership, magazine readers overwhelmingly prefer print, and this preference has been unwavering in the past 12 months. Perhaps surprisingly, given how many tablets that have been sold in the past 12 months, online magazine subscribers were flat at 2% of respondents. 88% of the survey still prefered to read their magazine content in printed hard copy, the same proportion as in 2010.  There are many reasons behind the decline in print magazine circulations, but migration to mobile device versions doesn’t seem to be one of them.

4. Despite the growth of alternative media sources, broadcast TV remains consumers favourite type of media – and this was observed across all age cohorts, including the 18-24s.  It would appear our attachment to the TV is enduring. However, our methods of consuming broadcast TV are changing with 12.5% less live viewing in 2011 vs 2010, mainly driven by an increase in consumption via PVRs. And the number one reason to record live TV? To fast forward through the commercials.

5. Traditional media channels still remain highly influential – 64% said they visited websites as a result of seeing them on TV, an action which was as common for 14-17 year olds as for 45-54 year olds. Magazine and newspaper ads were almost as influential (c60%) and more so than ads seen on other websites (c50%) and ads on social media (less than 30%). However, the gaps between digital and traditional media were narrow and the 2 most influential media in terms of driving traffic to websites were search and online recommendations – the latter mainly driven by online reviews rather than social media. 

In fact, online reviews seemed to be becoming even more influential, with 30% more stating they’d made online recommendations in 2011 vs 2010, with the sharpest growth in online recommendations amongst the 55+s.

 

The survey paints of picture of UK consumers being passionate adopters of new technology – more in line with their US counterparts rather than their European cousins – but using this media to complement their existing media choices and consume more media, rather than cannibalising their existing activities.

For marketers, the lessons are that they need to reflect changing trends in their marketing strategies – such as the increasing use of smartphones to support the in-store experience. However, despite the inexorable rise of digital media, UK consumers still remain attached to traditional channels too, and these traditional channels still have a role to play in the marketing mix.

 

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Mar
  • 6

Gen Y-ers Showing an Increasing Appetite for Luxury

USA-RETAIL/BLACKFRIDAYThe latest research from American Express Business Insights in the US reveals an interesting phenomenon – the fastest growth in spending on full price luxury goods in 2011 came from the 18-34 age group, commonly know as Generation Y.

Their spend on full priced luxury goods increased by 31% in 2011 over the previous year. Generation X’s (c35-48) full price luxury good spend increased too, but less sharply (23%). The spend of Baby Boomers (c48-65) increased by 19% but that of Seniors (65+) by only 6%.

So what was behind this marked increase in spend from the youngest of the 4 generations?

Well, the first simple explanation is that they have a year’s more seniority in their careers and a year’s more buying power in their wallets – although this factor alone wouldn’t explain such a marked rise.

It’s also true that luxury brands, and luxury fashion brands in particular, are increasingly getting their ‘act together’ online.  Digital savvy Gen Y-ers are more likely to be checking out brand websites (rather than bricks and mortar stores), product reviews, social media and mobile sites – and luxury brands are clearly rising to the challenge.

But the most interesting explanation is the rise of flash sales sites in the US.  Gen Y-ers were early adopters of these high discount, time-limited offer sites and their spend in this channel continues to increase markedly – up by 19% in 2011 when compared to 2010.

Now flash sales sites represent heavily discounted luxury goods sales but the belief of researchers at American Express Business Insights is that they’re creating a taste for luxury goods amongst younger consumers – hence discounted sales via flash sales sites are leading to full price sales direct from brands.

It’s an interesting insight which has ramifications for luxury brands in the UK. If the trend were followed it would make sense for them to partner with sites such as Vente-Privee, ACHICA and Secret Sales because participation seems to act as a particularly effective form of sampling for younger consumers in particular.

One note of caution, however. In the US in particular, flash sale sites are becoming increasingly popular with seniors – spend between 2010 and 2011 by this group grew by 28%. Considering full price luxury sales for this group in the same period grew by only 6%, the suggestion might be that private sale sites are cannibalising full price sales to a degree. Luxury brands with older followings might be well advised to steer clear.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Mar
  • 6

4 Insights to Inform Your Facebook Marketing Strategy

PD*17087469As a premium or luxury marketer, you know you have to have a presence on Facebook.  How can you ignore a channel in which your market are spending so much of their time talking to their peer group?

However, it’s one thing having a brand page on Facebook, it’s entirely another to use it as an effective marketing tool. And marketers are coming under increasing pressure to demonstrate commercial return for their investment in time and money.

The problem is, marketing on social networks is a relatively new phenomenon – we tend to forget that brand pages were launched only a few years ago.

However, new insights are being unearthed all the time into Facebook fans and their behaviour in this channel. These insights are helping to give brands some insight into how Facebook fits into their overall marketing strategy.

We’d like to share some of these recent key insights with you, and our thoughts on how they inform communication strategies on Facebook:

1. Consumers are Warming to Liking

A recent study from eVOC in the US found that 59% of Facebook users have liked a brand/company page in the past 6 months.  Consumers seem to be increasingly open to interacting with brands on Facebook.

An earlier study by TNS found that consumers in the UK were amongst the most reticent to interact with brands on Facebook, but as trends have a habit of moving from one side of the Atlantic to the other, it’s likely that UK consumers are becoming increasingly comfortable with interacting with brands in this environment too.

We read much about how brands should be shifting their Facebook focus from recruitment to engagement. The fact that the ‘50% tipping point’ has only just been reached in the US, and may not yet have been reached in the UK, suggests that recruitment should remain a key plank of any brand’s social media strategy if it’s going to maximise its potential in this channel.

2. Your Fans are Likely to Be Your Customers

4 of the top 5 reasons for ‘liking’ a brand on Facebook, according to the CMO Council, are ‘to be eligible for exclusive offers’ (67%), ‘to interact with other customers and share experiences’ (60%), to ‘find service and support’ (50%) and to ’share ideas for new products and features’ (41%).  These are all motivations likely to be exhibited by existing customers.

Even more compelling evidence comes from a study by DDB Worldwide/Opinionway Research last year which that found that 84% of the fans of a typical brand page were already customers.

If the majority of your fans are customers, then it makes sense to focus your Facebook strategy on specific marketing objectives -  increasing purchase frequency, enhancing customer service, increasing customer insight and engendering positive word of mouth.

3. However, They Won’t Necessarily Buy More from You Because They’re a Fan

If most followers are existing customers then a logical marketing objective would be to try and increase purchase frequency.

The problem is, a separate study (and we need to caveat this with the information that this study only looked at a couple of brands in the confectionary and soft drinks sector) found that purchase frequency didn’t increase as a result of becoming a brand’s Facebook fan. The study found that Facebook fans skewed heavily towards existing heavy purchasers - perhaps the reason that purchase frequency didn’t necessarily increase. In fact, by offering discounts and offers to their fanbases, brands may be cannibalising full price sales amongst existing customers.

Perhaps the reason that heavy users form the bulk of Facebook followings may just be related to the ‘new-ness’ of brand/consumer interaction on Facebook? So, as consumers become more comfortable with liking brands on Facebook, so they will ‘like’ more brands and ‘heavy’ brand-using fans will become diluted by lighter brand users with more potential for incremental sales.

In the meantime, it may be worthwhile to focus on discounts that genuinely incentivise incremental purchase (buy one, get a discount on another), encourage ‘upgrade purchases’ or have a ’member-get-member’ element.

4. You Want Fans to Engage, but on the Whole, They Don’t

A study by Australian marketing thinktank the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute found that only 1.3% of brands’ fan bases were liking, posting, commenting and sharing content. If ‘new likers’ were stripped out of these interaction figures, the engagment rate for established brands was only 0.45%. Clearly, a like is no guarantee of engagement.

This is no real surprise – it’s no doubt a reflection of the early stages of brand/consumer engagement via social media.  In addition. those prepared to ‘create’ content rather than just consume it will always be in the minority.

However, these content creators have been proven to be influential in their peer groups by previous studies and the fact that they’re prepared to put the time and effort into creating content shows their advocacy for the brand. So this self-identifying segment would seem to be ideal to focus word of mouth advocacy efforts on.

In addition, if engagement levels are going to be low, it makes sense to focus on using it to fulfil specific business goals – like the recruitment of new customers from advocates peer groups or with specific product feedback in mind – rather than wasting time and effort creating engagement for engagement’s sake.

 

So in summary, our advice would be not to slacken off your Facebook recruitment efforts, remember your fans are likely to be your customers too, try to incentivise genuine increases in purchase frequency and engage with specific business goals in mind.  These insights should give focus to your Facebook marketing efforts and put you on course for genuinely understanding your brand’s potential on the number one social network.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter

  • Feb
  • 7

5 Myths About Marketing to Affluents Online

5_Myths_about_Marketing_to_Affluents_OnlineLast week, we came across an interesting piece of research regarding affluents and digital media we thought we should share. 

It was conducted last year by Ipsos Mendolsohn in association with the Interactive Advertising Bureau and concerned the use of and attitudes towards digital media by affluent consumers. In this case, ‘affluents’ were defined as those with household incomes over $100,000 (the top 20% of earners).  And although the study was conducted exclusively in the US, we believe thay many parallels would be found amongst UK affluents.

The findings concurred with our own experience but conflicted with many of the myths that circulate about affluent consumers, namely: 

1. Affluent Consumers are More Difficult to Reach than their Less Affluent Counterparts

 This is certainly true of traditional media channels such as TV and radio – in both cases the research found that affluents spent just half of the time consuming TV and radio content than the general US population did – but not of digital media, where it was found that affluent consumers were easier to reach. 

The reasons? They’re more likely to use the internet (98% vs. 79% of the general US population), spend more time online (26.2 hrs per week vs 21.7 hrs per week) and are more likely to own digital devices such as smartphones and tablets when compared to the general population. 

In fact, 79% of them agreed that their lives had become ‘intertwined with technology’.

 2. Affluents Don’t Like Online Advertising 

In fact, affluents were more likely to understand and support (57% vs. 53%) the ad-funded content model than the rest of the US population, realising that publishers needed advertising to support their online activities. 

3. They’re Too Busy to Consume Advertising 

Not true, at least according to this research.  88% had recalled seeing a digital ad compared to 85% of the general US population. And the number of ads they recalled seeing was higher too – 21 in 7 days vs. 20 for the general population. And because of the higher penetration of smartphones, they were more likely to have been exposed to mobile advertising (42% vs. 39% for the general population). 

4. They May See Online Advertising, But They’re Not as Likely to Respond to It 

Wrong again.  Affluents were more likely to become a fan on a social networking site after seeing online advertising, more likely to make purchases (both online and offline) and more likely to share information via email, Twitter or Facebook etc. 

5. Affluents are Less Likely to Share Information About Themselves Online

In fact, the research found US affluents were happier to share information about themselves (32% vs 26% of the general US population) in order to get a better customized online experience. 

In the UK too, affluent consumers are more likely to be online, will spend more of their time online and will access the internet via a wider range of digital devices than their less affluent counterparts. Given this, the reticence of premium and luxury brands to engage deeply in digital channels becomes all the more puzzling. 

In truth, they should be innovating at the sharp end of digital media and many of the successful brands, such as Burberry, are doing exactly that.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print

By: Graham Painter